What were the rankings of the Sundays in this calendar? Which class feasts took precidence over Sundays? This should be mentioned in this article. 68.193.18.102 ( talk) 02:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This information is already given in the article on Ranking of liturgical days in the Roman Rite, in the section on Sundays. Perhaps that is enough. Esoglou ( talk) 09:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
68.193.18.102 ( talk) 17:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Sundays in Advent, Christmastide, Lent, and Eastertide (up to and including Trinity Sunday) are of the I class, and all other Sundays are of the II class. -- HGK745 ( talk) 04:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
For linking of dates in this article to be restored, the Wikipedia Manual of Style would first have to be changed: "Dates should not be linked purely for the purpose of autoformatting (even though linking was previously recommended). Dates should only be linked when they are germane and topical to the subject, as discussed at Wikipedia:Linking#Chronological items." Esoglou ( talk) 09:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I DO NOT KNOW if he is a known editor, and it is a legimate user: well, I am a normal user, duh. Editorial disagreements are common, on Wikipedia. Veverve ( talk) 22:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted several Filipino saint additions for two reasons:
I don't think that we should list doctors named as such after 1960: there is no warrant, even with the CDF decree of 2020, to celebrate them as such. This goes especially for the Teresas and St Catherine, whose propers even in the usus recentior, are not adjusted accordingly. I believe therefore that St Lawrence of Brindisi is the last pre-conciliar doctor and all other changes should be reverted. After all, this is the page for the General Roman Calendar of 1960 and not of 1954 or 1969/2002, whatever we might prefer in our personal and devotional lives. Johnnygoesmarchinghome ( talk) 19:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
In principle, such an addition could be welcomed, but it is unsourced and not comprehensive. Secondary patrons are omitted (perhaps for the best), and the Institut du Bon Pasteur is missing, despite being a society of apostolic life of pontifical right and therefore of some importance compared to traditionalist institutes of diocesan right or which are merely public associations of the faithful; ditto the Benedictine abbeys or priories, some of which are subject to the Holy See, others belonging to the Solesmes congregation. As it stands, the section needs to be removed or else sourced appropriately. Johnnygoesmarchinghome ( talk) 15:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What were the rankings of the Sundays in this calendar? Which class feasts took precidence over Sundays? This should be mentioned in this article. 68.193.18.102 ( talk) 02:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This information is already given in the article on Ranking of liturgical days in the Roman Rite, in the section on Sundays. Perhaps that is enough. Esoglou ( talk) 09:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
68.193.18.102 ( talk) 17:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Sundays in Advent, Christmastide, Lent, and Eastertide (up to and including Trinity Sunday) are of the I class, and all other Sundays are of the II class. -- HGK745 ( talk) 04:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
For linking of dates in this article to be restored, the Wikipedia Manual of Style would first have to be changed: "Dates should not be linked purely for the purpose of autoformatting (even though linking was previously recommended). Dates should only be linked when they are germane and topical to the subject, as discussed at Wikipedia:Linking#Chronological items." Esoglou ( talk) 09:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I DO NOT KNOW if he is a known editor, and it is a legimate user: well, I am a normal user, duh. Editorial disagreements are common, on Wikipedia. Veverve ( talk) 22:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted several Filipino saint additions for two reasons:
I don't think that we should list doctors named as such after 1960: there is no warrant, even with the CDF decree of 2020, to celebrate them as such. This goes especially for the Teresas and St Catherine, whose propers even in the usus recentior, are not adjusted accordingly. I believe therefore that St Lawrence of Brindisi is the last pre-conciliar doctor and all other changes should be reverted. After all, this is the page for the General Roman Calendar of 1960 and not of 1954 or 1969/2002, whatever we might prefer in our personal and devotional lives. Johnnygoesmarchinghome ( talk) 19:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
In principle, such an addition could be welcomed, but it is unsourced and not comprehensive. Secondary patrons are omitted (perhaps for the best), and the Institut du Bon Pasteur is missing, despite being a society of apostolic life of pontifical right and therefore of some importance compared to traditionalist institutes of diocesan right or which are merely public associations of the faithful; ditto the Benedictine abbeys or priories, some of which are subject to the Holy See, others belonging to the Solesmes congregation. As it stands, the section needs to be removed or else sourced appropriately. Johnnygoesmarchinghome ( talk) 15:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)