GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Viriditas ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | WP:OVERLINK in lead |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
Given the results of the peer review report
[1] and the fact that the nominator has never edited this article, I'm considering a quick fail.
Viriditas (
talk)
01:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC) After looking at the article, I see many quotes lacking citations, many existing "citation needed" tags, and many unsourced sentences and paragraphs. In addition to the many MOS problems listed by the peer review report, I'm also quick failing this because the nominator has never edited this article. If you are still interested, please put this article through peer review first. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 01:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC) |
Please add any related discussion here.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Viriditas ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | WP:OVERLINK in lead |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
Given the results of the peer review report
[1] and the fact that the nominator has never edited this article, I'm considering a quick fail.
Viriditas (
talk)
01:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC) After looking at the article, I see many quotes lacking citations, many existing "citation needed" tags, and many unsourced sentences and paragraphs. In addition to the many MOS problems listed by the peer review report, I'm also quick failing this because the nominator has never edited this article. If you are still interested, please put this article through peer review first. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 01:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC) |
Please add any related discussion here.