![]() | A fact from General Lew Wallace Study appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 June 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wallace invented the Popeil Fisherman?
"And if you call within the next 10 minutes we'll also include... "
Jhendin ( talk) 08:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
"presiding over the kangaroo court that resulted in the execution of Henry Wirz for the Union deaths at Andersonville prison" Having looked at the Wiki article on the Wirz trial to refresh my memory, it was controversial, but I do not think a consensus of opinion exists to justify labeling it, without qualification, a "kangaroo court." It was a court-martial; it was a war-crimes trial; it was just a "trial." It seems like the pro-Confederate editorializing inherent in the phrase "kangaroo court" is both questionable, and out of place in an article about a building. 71.86.117.123 ( talk) 09:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand why this is article is rated of 'High Importance' in the National Register of Historic Places? The location is the study of a minor general in the U.S. Army. He has some literary note and had some minor roles in the national government, i.e., foreign affairs. All of his activities had insignificant impact on national policy, development or society. I'd assume 'mid-importance' just on the number of areas he was involved in. I'd recommend are review and change in the importance rating. Chris Light ( talk) 00:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General Lew Wallace Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from General Lew Wallace Study appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 June 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wallace invented the Popeil Fisherman?
"And if you call within the next 10 minutes we'll also include... "
Jhendin ( talk) 08:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
"presiding over the kangaroo court that resulted in the execution of Henry Wirz for the Union deaths at Andersonville prison" Having looked at the Wiki article on the Wirz trial to refresh my memory, it was controversial, but I do not think a consensus of opinion exists to justify labeling it, without qualification, a "kangaroo court." It was a court-martial; it was a war-crimes trial; it was just a "trial." It seems like the pro-Confederate editorializing inherent in the phrase "kangaroo court" is both questionable, and out of place in an article about a building. 71.86.117.123 ( talk) 09:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand why this is article is rated of 'High Importance' in the National Register of Historic Places? The location is the study of a minor general in the U.S. Army. He has some literary note and had some minor roles in the national government, i.e., foreign affairs. All of his activities had insignificant impact on national policy, development or society. I'd assume 'mid-importance' just on the number of areas he was involved in. I'd recommend are review and change in the importance rating. Chris Light ( talk) 00:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General Lew Wallace Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)