![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I nominated this to be merged into Stained glass because I do not think there is enough material for this to expand into a complete article. The article on the French Wikipedia was started a year ago and barely expanded. :: mikm t 18:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I merged the Gemmaux article to here and discontinued the redirect. I think it's worth having a small separate article, even though it will never be a big one. I checked what linked to both articles and took care of any needed changes, I believe. Some discussion: Talk:Gemmaux#Article title/Merge to Gemmail?. Eric talk 16:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
I've again restored the Womacka illustration, which shows an actual example of gemmail glass, and removed the unhelpful photo of Picasso, which merely shows the artist writing something on a piece of paper, a something that's obviously not the scripted words attached below the photo. --
CliffC (
talk)
02:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
FYI all: It looks like there's someone using a few accounts to do promotional edits to articles mentioning gemmail ( Gemmail and Stained glass#twentieth century). The same usernames are busy with corresponding edits on the French WP as well, and are uncommunicative on both wikis. LPLT, an editor here on en, as well as an admin on fr, has been dealing with the same entity on fr.
Eric talk 21:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC), Amandajm ( talk) 01:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
For anyone interested in expanding this article, there is some source info below that may help. It is excerpted from a bibliography put together by a librarian at the Rakow Library at the Corning Museum of Glass. This was a quick cut and paste; I may have messed up some punctuation and formatting.
Books and catalogs:
Eric talk 14:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
The image in the article doesn't seem to be a gemmail but a regular stained glass artwork. Dornicke ( talk) 00:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gemmail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I nominated this to be merged into Stained glass because I do not think there is enough material for this to expand into a complete article. The article on the French Wikipedia was started a year ago and barely expanded. :: mikm t 18:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I merged the Gemmaux article to here and discontinued the redirect. I think it's worth having a small separate article, even though it will never be a big one. I checked what linked to both articles and took care of any needed changes, I believe. Some discussion: Talk:Gemmaux#Article title/Merge to Gemmail?. Eric talk 16:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
I've again restored the Womacka illustration, which shows an actual example of gemmail glass, and removed the unhelpful photo of Picasso, which merely shows the artist writing something on a piece of paper, a something that's obviously not the scripted words attached below the photo. --
CliffC (
talk)
02:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
FYI all: It looks like there's someone using a few accounts to do promotional edits to articles mentioning gemmail ( Gemmail and Stained glass#twentieth century). The same usernames are busy with corresponding edits on the French WP as well, and are uncommunicative on both wikis. LPLT, an editor here on en, as well as an admin on fr, has been dealing with the same entity on fr.
Eric talk 21:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC), Amandajm ( talk) 01:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
For anyone interested in expanding this article, there is some source info below that may help. It is excerpted from a bibliography put together by a librarian at the Rakow Library at the Corning Museum of Glass. This was a quick cut and paste; I may have messed up some punctuation and formatting.
Books and catalogs:
Eric talk 14:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
The image in the article doesn't seem to be a gemmail but a regular stained glass artwork. Dornicke ( talk) 00:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gemmail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)