This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ged Kearney article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Ged Kearney has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from Ged Kearney appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ged Kearney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Several people on the ABC have claimed that Kearney is the first nurse to be elected to the House of Representatives (Fran Kelly on Insiders), or even the federal parliament (Annabel Crabb on the SA Votes coverage). This Wikidata query shows there were two others (Wendy Fatin and Trish Worth). I believe they have corrected it now, but just in case someone adds this claim to the article... -- Canley ( talk) 02:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GMH Melbourne ( talk · contribs) 04:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
In relation to this revision:
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 06:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC) Also–
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 10:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
As far as I can tell, the following info has not been properly verified:
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 06:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 04:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
The article, in my view, now meets the GA criteria. ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 00:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
00:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by GraziePrego ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ged Kearney; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ged Kearney article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Ged Kearney has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from Ged Kearney appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 December 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ged Kearney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Several people on the ABC have claimed that Kearney is the first nurse to be elected to the House of Representatives (Fran Kelly on Insiders), or even the federal parliament (Annabel Crabb on the SA Votes coverage). This Wikidata query shows there were two others (Wendy Fatin and Trish Worth). I believe they have corrected it now, but just in case someone adds this claim to the article... -- Canley ( talk) 02:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GMH Melbourne ( talk · contribs) 04:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
In relation to this revision:
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 06:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC) Also–
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 10:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
As far as I can tell, the following info has not been properly verified:
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 06:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 04:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
Pass ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 07:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
The article, in my view, now meets the GA criteria. ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk) 00:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC) |
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
00:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by GraziePrego ( talk). Self-nominated at 06:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ged Kearney; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.