This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A new page GAUSSIAN (file format) is needed, which should cross link to Chemical file format and use also the proper [[Category:Chemical file format]] category. JKW 16:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
This section is, as the last editor of it commented, now more NPOV, but it dominates the article. The latest comment about the response from Gaussian Inc needs sourcing. I also think that Gaussian Inc only allows the use of executables without source code at universities were there are competitors, but I could be wrong. The solution to the dominance of this article by this issue is of course to expand the article with good information about the program. I'll try to do that but I will be on a wikibreak very soon for a few weeks. -- Bduke 21:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The statement that the ban affects "direct competitors" is highly misleading. People were banned for simply comparing it to other software. It is also notable that the original author, Nobel Prize winner Prof. Pople, was banned from using the program, yet they're still using his name to promote it.-- 87.162.12.35 ( talk) 02:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Added online Reference to Gaussian Inc.'s response to the accusations.
Nuno A. G. Bandeira
Since all the other programs are in Quantum chemistry computer programs, should we delete the list of other programs? -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted an edit that removed most of the material about the "banned by Gaussian" controversy. It is not reasonable to ignore it, and it is certainly not reasonable to have the Gaussian Inc response to it but no link to the banned by Gaussian page itself. It may need some clean up, so let us discuss it here. -- Bduke (Discussion) 00:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I have removed some criticism of GAUSSIAN that was completely unsourced and in many respects just wrong. The methods in Gaussian are all published and the code is available, at least to G03, although many people now only purchase binaries. They are also do not ban you just for being critical. -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I would like to upload some images and clips I have created using Gaussian, are there any special restrictions to do that? Amirber ( talk) 14:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A new page GAUSSIAN (file format) is needed, which should cross link to Chemical file format and use also the proper [[Category:Chemical file format]] category. JKW 16:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
This section is, as the last editor of it commented, now more NPOV, but it dominates the article. The latest comment about the response from Gaussian Inc needs sourcing. I also think that Gaussian Inc only allows the use of executables without source code at universities were there are competitors, but I could be wrong. The solution to the dominance of this article by this issue is of course to expand the article with good information about the program. I'll try to do that but I will be on a wikibreak very soon for a few weeks. -- Bduke 21:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The statement that the ban affects "direct competitors" is highly misleading. People were banned for simply comparing it to other software. It is also notable that the original author, Nobel Prize winner Prof. Pople, was banned from using the program, yet they're still using his name to promote it.-- 87.162.12.35 ( talk) 02:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Added online Reference to Gaussian Inc.'s response to the accusations.
Nuno A. G. Bandeira
Since all the other programs are in Quantum chemistry computer programs, should we delete the list of other programs? -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted an edit that removed most of the material about the "banned by Gaussian" controversy. It is not reasonable to ignore it, and it is certainly not reasonable to have the Gaussian Inc response to it but no link to the banned by Gaussian page itself. It may need some clean up, so let us discuss it here. -- Bduke (Discussion) 00:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I have removed some criticism of GAUSSIAN that was completely unsourced and in many respects just wrong. The methods in Gaussian are all published and the code is available, at least to G03, although many people now only purchase binaries. They are also do not ban you just for being critical. -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I would like to upload some images and clips I have created using Gaussian, are there any special restrictions to do that? Amirber ( talk) 14:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)