The image Image:Gasolina (Papa A.P. version).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 00:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Source : Funradio.fr => "Lire la suite".
Source : Funlux.be
Source : Disqueenfrance.com (official site of the SNEP).
Wow, what's up with you man? A minute ago I you were cool and now you're biting my head off. Where's the wikilove man, I'm not here to disrupt the project, I'm here to help. Please assume good faith and don't make unjustified accusations, if I was hellbent on deleting this article I would not have conceded to it's notabillity. Regards, Kartel King ( talk) 06:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Edel is his label and no source states that EMI is, I also took the liberty to do a search on both the main website and latin subsidary and he has no history on either. If you are to use his interview in this article with that promotional sentence which states people accept his version in the "hood" of new york it needs to be the full sentence and you can't use (...) to excluse inconvenient parts. Also translations are up for interpratation, and there is no evidence to prove the statement "had success in America". Kartel King ( talk) 06:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
From plagiarism.org:
In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes.
arimareiji ( talk) 15:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
From the Law Encyclopedia:
Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits.
Kartel King ( talk) 03:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Plagiarism is theft of another person's writings or ideas. Generally, it occurs when someone steals expressions from another author's composition and makes them appear to be his own work. Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits. Courts recognize acts of plagiarism as violations of copyright law, specifically as the theft of another creator's intellectual property.
I'm seriously starting to doubt your intentions now and wether infact you are editing to improve the article or to make a point and "defeat" me. The context of my quote does not contradict me at all, and it clearly shows you were wrong in saying "legal term" as plagiarism is not a legal term. And please do not feign incomprehension, you know very well what I was insinuating with my P.S. sentence and it is quite clear to anyone who visits that site. I completely disagree with your conclusion that it could be considered slander and as this is a song not a biography I am inserting the NON-legal term plagiarism. Kartel King ( talk) 19:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The information on this article should be placed on the original version of " Gasolina" since it IS a cover version. Note that Raymond Ayala (a.k.a. Daddy Yankee) and Eddie Avila are noted as the writers. It should be under its own section in the article. El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Kartel King: You reverted my edit with an edit summary of "Removed redlinks and pov". Except that's not what you did; you reverted all of my edits, including formatting corrections. Additionally, the only redlinks I added were valid per WP:RED—I linked the album title in 2 places, an album with 2 hit singles on it when only 1 hit single is needed to pass WP:NALBUMS (which I alluded to in my edit summary). Also, I'm not sure what part of my edit you think is POV, if anything, I made the article more neutral. Please discuss any issues you have with my edit here first, rather than reverting again. I'm not interested in an edit war. TheJazzDalek ( talk) 11:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The image Image:Gasolina (Papa A.P. version).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 00:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Source : Funradio.fr => "Lire la suite".
Source : Funlux.be
Source : Disqueenfrance.com (official site of the SNEP).
Wow, what's up with you man? A minute ago I you were cool and now you're biting my head off. Where's the wikilove man, I'm not here to disrupt the project, I'm here to help. Please assume good faith and don't make unjustified accusations, if I was hellbent on deleting this article I would not have conceded to it's notabillity. Regards, Kartel King ( talk) 06:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Edel is his label and no source states that EMI is, I also took the liberty to do a search on both the main website and latin subsidary and he has no history on either. If you are to use his interview in this article with that promotional sentence which states people accept his version in the "hood" of new york it needs to be the full sentence and you can't use (...) to excluse inconvenient parts. Also translations are up for interpratation, and there is no evidence to prove the statement "had success in America". Kartel King ( talk) 06:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
From plagiarism.org:
In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes.
arimareiji ( talk) 15:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
From the Law Encyclopedia:
Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits.
Kartel King ( talk) 03:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Plagiarism is theft of another person's writings or ideas. Generally, it occurs when someone steals expressions from another author's composition and makes them appear to be his own work. Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits. Courts recognize acts of plagiarism as violations of copyright law, specifically as the theft of another creator's intellectual property.
I'm seriously starting to doubt your intentions now and wether infact you are editing to improve the article or to make a point and "defeat" me. The context of my quote does not contradict me at all, and it clearly shows you were wrong in saying "legal term" as plagiarism is not a legal term. And please do not feign incomprehension, you know very well what I was insinuating with my P.S. sentence and it is quite clear to anyone who visits that site. I completely disagree with your conclusion that it could be considered slander and as this is a song not a biography I am inserting the NON-legal term plagiarism. Kartel King ( talk) 19:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The information on this article should be placed on the original version of " Gasolina" since it IS a cover version. Note that Raymond Ayala (a.k.a. Daddy Yankee) and Eddie Avila are noted as the writers. It should be under its own section in the article. El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Kartel King: You reverted my edit with an edit summary of "Removed redlinks and pov". Except that's not what you did; you reverted all of my edits, including formatting corrections. Additionally, the only redlinks I added were valid per WP:RED—I linked the album title in 2 places, an album with 2 hit singles on it when only 1 hit single is needed to pass WP:NALBUMS (which I alluded to in my edit summary). Also, I'm not sure what part of my edit you think is POV, if anything, I made the article more neutral. Please discuss any issues you have with my edit here first, rather than reverting again. I'm not interested in an edit war. TheJazzDalek ( talk) 11:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)