![]() | Gasketball has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Gasketball is part of the Greg Wohlwend series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 7, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the success of
Mikengreg's
Solipskier gave them the means to experiment when making
Gasketball? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 21:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Will do this one tomorrow. ☠
Jag
uar ☠
21:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All the references check out fine, and also the citations are in the correct places so this qualifies the GA criteria.
This is a compact article so there were very little prose problems here. The article is generally written well, if not that broad but it is definitely GA worthy. The only concern I have is the slight informality in the lead and the couple copy editing issues in the Development section. Only those issues block Gasketball's chance of becoming GA! Czar, I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days but I will be off-Wiki for some time soon. If you can address those issues (which are minor) this article should become GA. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 20:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
You're right, maybe I was being too cautious! Following does imply "fan following" and concerning the couches, if it is in the source then it should be in the article. Despite the short review the article meets the GA criteria. Well done! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 10:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Gasketball has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Gasketball is part of the Greg Wohlwend series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 7, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the success of
Mikengreg's
Solipskier gave them the means to experiment when making
Gasketball? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 21:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Will do this one tomorrow. ☠
Jag
uar ☠
21:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All the references check out fine, and also the citations are in the correct places so this qualifies the GA criteria.
This is a compact article so there were very little prose problems here. The article is generally written well, if not that broad but it is definitely GA worthy. The only concern I have is the slight informality in the lead and the couple copy editing issues in the Development section. Only those issues block Gasketball's chance of becoming GA! Czar, I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days but I will be off-Wiki for some time soon. If you can address those issues (which are minor) this article should become GA. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 20:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
You're right, maybe I was being too cautious! Following does imply "fan following" and concerning the couches, if it is in the source then it should be in the article. Despite the short review the article meets the GA criteria. Well done! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 10:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)