![]() | Gas in Turkey has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gug01 ( talk · contribs) 20:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Hello, @ Chidgk1:! I'm Gug01, and I'll be reviewing this good article nomination. Gug01 ( talk) 20:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
While this article shows great promise, it's nowhere near ready to be a good article at the moment.
The article fails to be a GA on multiple criteria. However, I have left a wealth of specific line-by-line opportunities for improvement in the section below, and I hope these will be of use to boost this article's quality. Gug01 ( talk) 21:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ 103.246.36.121 - you recently added the following to Energy in Turkey
In 2022, it was announced that there is a shortage, which is bigger than any other previous shortages. This is because a lot of energy which comes from Iran cannot be supplied. [1]
Could you possibly move it to this article as this article is more specific. Also it is time consuming for editors to check Youtube cites - but I am sure we can find a suitable written cite. Awaiting your thoughts
Chidgk1 ( talk) 08:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
As you can see the lead section of this article is excerpted to Energy_in_Turkey#Oil_and_gas. So if you move it to the lead here it will automatically appear in the other article. The advantage of using excerpts is that it is easier for future editors to keep subjects up to date as they only have to edit in one place.
Re the cite your use of DW is good as they are a reliable source. But rather than their Youtube video I suggest it would be better to have something in writing. That way people who want to check the cite in future can easily search it rather than having to listen to the whole video. However please don't use Daily Sabah as it is not reliable according to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources If you have any trouble finding a written source let me know. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Energy#What_unit_should_I_use_for_oil? Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I have never made one before but it looks not too difficult - for example with https://matplotlib.org/stable/api/sankey_api.html Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
https://enerji.gov.tr//Media/Dizin/EIGM/tr/Raporlar/TUEP/T%C3%BCrkiye_Ulusal_Enerji_Plan%C4%B1.pdf Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I will get to this review in the next week. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN. I will be using this review in the WikiCup. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I firstly have concerns about the scope of this article, Chidgk1. Why "Oil and gas in Turkey"? Why not merge with Coal in Turkey to form Fossil fuels in Turkey or some such article? If not, why not Oil in Turkey and Gas in Turkey as separate articles? Why are the two fuels bundled together?
This in turn causes great problems with MOS:LEAD and MOS:LAYOUT, as the article doesn't know what to focus on and consequently stutters. I am placing this on hold for the time being, while we have a discussion on this large issue. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
You will note that I have reorganised the layout of the article.
@ AirshipJungleman29: I think I have now covered all your points above - if not please let me know. Do you have any other suggestions - for example perhaps the supply section would be clearer if I subsectioned by country?
More to come, along with the source spotcheck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
@ AirshipJungleman29: I think I have now covered all your points above - if not please let me know. Looking forward to more. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay, Chidgk1. See above for responses, and below for a source spotcheck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Source spotcheck passed.
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Turkey-Oil-Product-Tankers-Must-Have-Insurance-From-February-6.html Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
due war btc now Baku's only export route. according to https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijans-oil-exports-restart-amid-high-demand-in-europe also says 2 thirds to eu Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
https://shura.org.tr/en/net-zero-2053-a-roadmap-for-the-turkish-electricity-sector/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
English report link https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/1-1275/reportsreports seems completely empty
https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-94/yillik-sektor-raporu does not have 2022 annual gas report yet
however there are a complete set of 2022 monthly reports at https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-95/aylik-sektor-raporu Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Therefore probably best to use Dec 22 stats for now and replace them with whole year when annual report published. Otherwise will be tedious to add everything up over 12 reports.
Then the from country quantities (and perhaps other stuff) could be graphed by year to make easir to see
https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/turkiye-electricity-review-2023/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Probably deserves
https://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/south-akcakoca-sub-basin-gas-field-black-sea/
https://www.offshore-energy.biz/with-abundance-of-gas-pay-uncovered-two-more-black-sea-wells-coming-online-in-march/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/turkmenistan-europe-gas/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Gas in Turkey has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gug01 ( talk · contribs) 20:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Hello, @ Chidgk1:! I'm Gug01, and I'll be reviewing this good article nomination. Gug01 ( talk) 20:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
While this article shows great promise, it's nowhere near ready to be a good article at the moment.
The article fails to be a GA on multiple criteria. However, I have left a wealth of specific line-by-line opportunities for improvement in the section below, and I hope these will be of use to boost this article's quality. Gug01 ( talk) 21:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ 103.246.36.121 - you recently added the following to Energy in Turkey
In 2022, it was announced that there is a shortage, which is bigger than any other previous shortages. This is because a lot of energy which comes from Iran cannot be supplied. [1]
Could you possibly move it to this article as this article is more specific. Also it is time consuming for editors to check Youtube cites - but I am sure we can find a suitable written cite. Awaiting your thoughts
Chidgk1 ( talk) 08:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
As you can see the lead section of this article is excerpted to Energy_in_Turkey#Oil_and_gas. So if you move it to the lead here it will automatically appear in the other article. The advantage of using excerpts is that it is easier for future editors to keep subjects up to date as they only have to edit in one place.
Re the cite your use of DW is good as they are a reliable source. But rather than their Youtube video I suggest it would be better to have something in writing. That way people who want to check the cite in future can easily search it rather than having to listen to the whole video. However please don't use Daily Sabah as it is not reliable according to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources If you have any trouble finding a written source let me know. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Energy#What_unit_should_I_use_for_oil? Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
I have never made one before but it looks not too difficult - for example with https://matplotlib.org/stable/api/sankey_api.html Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
https://enerji.gov.tr//Media/Dizin/EIGM/tr/Raporlar/TUEP/T%C3%BCrkiye_Ulusal_Enerji_Plan%C4%B1.pdf Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I will get to this review in the next week. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN. I will be using this review in the WikiCup. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I firstly have concerns about the scope of this article, Chidgk1. Why "Oil and gas in Turkey"? Why not merge with Coal in Turkey to form Fossil fuels in Turkey or some such article? If not, why not Oil in Turkey and Gas in Turkey as separate articles? Why are the two fuels bundled together?
This in turn causes great problems with MOS:LEAD and MOS:LAYOUT, as the article doesn't know what to focus on and consequently stutters. I am placing this on hold for the time being, while we have a discussion on this large issue. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
You will note that I have reorganised the layout of the article.
@ AirshipJungleman29: I think I have now covered all your points above - if not please let me know. Do you have any other suggestions - for example perhaps the supply section would be clearer if I subsectioned by country?
More to come, along with the source spotcheck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
@ AirshipJungleman29: I think I have now covered all your points above - if not please let me know. Looking forward to more. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay, Chidgk1. See above for responses, and below for a source spotcheck. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Source spotcheck passed.
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Turkey-Oil-Product-Tankers-Must-Have-Insurance-From-February-6.html Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
due war btc now Baku's only export route. according to https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijans-oil-exports-restart-amid-high-demand-in-europe also says 2 thirds to eu Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
https://shura.org.tr/en/net-zero-2053-a-roadmap-for-the-turkish-electricity-sector/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
English report link https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/1-1275/reportsreports seems completely empty
https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-94/yillik-sektor-raporu does not have 2022 annual gas report yet
however there are a complete set of 2022 monthly reports at https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-95/aylik-sektor-raporu Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Therefore probably best to use Dec 22 stats for now and replace them with whole year when annual report published. Otherwise will be tedious to add everything up over 12 reports.
Then the from country quantities (and perhaps other stuff) could be graphed by year to make easir to see
https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/turkiye-electricity-review-2023/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Probably deserves
https://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/south-akcakoca-sub-basin-gas-field-black-sea/
https://www.offshore-energy.biz/with-abundance-of-gas-pay-uncovered-two-more-black-sea-wells-coming-online-in-march/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/turkmenistan-europe-gas/ Chidgk1 ( talk) 19:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)