This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
Here is the edit of that section as it should stand. I [Ratel] am not editing the page any longer (reasons above) but I invite other editors to use this as a template:
Group affiliations The Natural Resources Stewardship Project, a Canadian front group tied to energy industry lobbyists, listed Paltridge as an "allied expert" between February 2007 and January 2008. [n 6] [n 7] In 2005 the Australian APEC Study Centre, a pro- free trade think tank that advocates against the Kyoto Protocol and other climate change mitigation measures, held a conference —sponsored by Xstrata Coal and ExxonMobil [n 8]— at Parliament House entitled "Managing Climate Change: Practicalities and Realities in a post-Kyoto future". Paltridge delivered a speech at the conference, [n 9] [n 10] [n 11] in which he stated, referring to the IPCC's scientific consensus on climate change, that "[scientific] consensus is not the sort of thing on which sensible people put their money". [n 12] He also stated that the apparent convergence of the predictions of the IPCC models into a narrower range of possible temperature rise has to be taken with "a considerable grain of salt". [n 13] Paltridge has also been linked to the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), an Australian conservative think-tank. In 2009 he was listed on their website as an associate, [n 14] and his paper Limiting Greenhouse Warming: Is It Worth the Cost? could be downloaded from the IPA website. [n 15] |
|
The acronym MEP is I think not a good idea for the Wikipedia to foster. The physics of proposed principles, such as of of maximum rate entropy production, is not well established, while the use of such an acronym suggests that "everyone knows about this established fact"; it suggests a point of view of familiarity with an old friend, when perhaps the right attitude is one of suspicion of a dodgy-looking stranger. I would like to delete the acronym MEP from its new appearance here. Chjoaygame ( talk) 08:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Is there any reason why this person is notable? VR talk 10:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I have weakened a new edit that intended to give greater credibility to Paltridge's proposal of maximum rate of entropy production.
My reason is that the proposal is disputed and this should be made clear. The proposal has been taken up with enthusiasm by some writers, but the disputation is on strong ground, and the proposal has no theoretical justification. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics is a difficult and poorly understood subject. I suggest editors on this point examine the literature very carefully. Chjoaygame ( talk) 04:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once. This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on
WP:BLPN and
WP:CFD the category was deleted.
Peter Gulutzan (
talk)
17:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Garth Paltridge. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Garth Paltridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Global warming hiatus explains, with sources, why this is not a real effect, but only an alleged one: it is based only on the very high value in the year 1998, plus three rookie mistakes:
Avoiding any one of these rookie mistakes destroys the "hiatus". Adding "alleged" is like adding "pseudoscientific" before "homeopathy". -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 09:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
Here is the edit of that section as it should stand. I [Ratel] am not editing the page any longer (reasons above) but I invite other editors to use this as a template:
Group affiliations The Natural Resources Stewardship Project, a Canadian front group tied to energy industry lobbyists, listed Paltridge as an "allied expert" between February 2007 and January 2008. [n 6] [n 7] In 2005 the Australian APEC Study Centre, a pro- free trade think tank that advocates against the Kyoto Protocol and other climate change mitigation measures, held a conference —sponsored by Xstrata Coal and ExxonMobil [n 8]— at Parliament House entitled "Managing Climate Change: Practicalities and Realities in a post-Kyoto future". Paltridge delivered a speech at the conference, [n 9] [n 10] [n 11] in which he stated, referring to the IPCC's scientific consensus on climate change, that "[scientific] consensus is not the sort of thing on which sensible people put their money". [n 12] He also stated that the apparent convergence of the predictions of the IPCC models into a narrower range of possible temperature rise has to be taken with "a considerable grain of salt". [n 13] Paltridge has also been linked to the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), an Australian conservative think-tank. In 2009 he was listed on their website as an associate, [n 14] and his paper Limiting Greenhouse Warming: Is It Worth the Cost? could be downloaded from the IPA website. [n 15] |
|
The acronym MEP is I think not a good idea for the Wikipedia to foster. The physics of proposed principles, such as of of maximum rate entropy production, is not well established, while the use of such an acronym suggests that "everyone knows about this established fact"; it suggests a point of view of familiarity with an old friend, when perhaps the right attitude is one of suspicion of a dodgy-looking stranger. I would like to delete the acronym MEP from its new appearance here. Chjoaygame ( talk) 08:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Is there any reason why this person is notable? VR talk 10:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I have weakened a new edit that intended to give greater credibility to Paltridge's proposal of maximum rate of entropy production.
My reason is that the proposal is disputed and this should be made clear. The proposal has been taken up with enthusiasm by some writers, but the disputation is on strong ground, and the proposal has no theoretical justification. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics is a difficult and poorly understood subject. I suggest editors on this point examine the literature very carefully. Chjoaygame ( talk) 04:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once. This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on
WP:BLPN and
WP:CFD the category was deleted.
Peter Gulutzan (
talk)
17:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Garth Paltridge. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Garth Paltridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Global warming hiatus explains, with sources, why this is not a real effect, but only an alleged one: it is based only on the very high value in the year 1998, plus three rookie mistakes:
Avoiding any one of these rookie mistakes destroys the "hiatus". Adding "alleged" is like adding "pseudoscientific" before "homeopathy". -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 09:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)