This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That is unacceptable behavior. If you dispute swomething, add a dispute tag. But one does NOT wholesale-erase well-documented text. -- Tenebrae 14:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Image:ArsenalOfMiracles.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be some formatting problem in chapter 1.4. There is a strange frame around the novel "Thief of Llarn". I guess someone made a mistake, when he deleted an image. I don't know how to correct it. Perhaps someone can help. -- Raglad ( talk) 20:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
The section on Kothar needs serious cleanup - it's at least 90% original research and personal opinion, with very little encyclopedic material Euchrid ( talk) 06:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I can't right now, and it would be perhaps frustrating considering the circumstances (ex: a thousand bloody pen names), but if Fox really is Rod Gray we probably need to clean up the article regarding the Lady From L.U.S.T. work. It definitely doesn't belong in section 3.3, for example, and isn't cited anywhere in section 6. Kell ( talk) 20:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
In regard to the novel "Escape Across the Cosmos" aka "Titans of the Universe" I think, but am not sure, it was reissued again as "Star Chase" with yet another pen name (Brian James Royal).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gardner Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gardner Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The article includes two lines:
The first suggests that 1,500 is an accurate-ish estimate, whereas the second isn't only claiming what he was "definitely credited with." I believe the first needs an "at least 1,500" in it introduction is probably needed to get them to match. How exhaustive is the source used ("Mike's Amazing World of Comics") because from it Fox only wrote 113 comics for other companies, which isn't the 2,500 suggested in the intro.
While it's worth knowing how high his numbers are, a source that only has a very low estimate may not be very helpful. If he really did, say, 3,000 stories at DC, saying "definitely credited with 1,500" doesn't seem fair to him. Duggy 1138 ( talk) 05:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That is unacceptable behavior. If you dispute swomething, add a dispute tag. But one does NOT wholesale-erase well-documented text. -- Tenebrae 14:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Image:ArsenalOfMiracles.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be some formatting problem in chapter 1.4. There is a strange frame around the novel "Thief of Llarn". I guess someone made a mistake, when he deleted an image. I don't know how to correct it. Perhaps someone can help. -- Raglad ( talk) 20:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
The section on Kothar needs serious cleanup - it's at least 90% original research and personal opinion, with very little encyclopedic material Euchrid ( talk) 06:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I can't right now, and it would be perhaps frustrating considering the circumstances (ex: a thousand bloody pen names), but if Fox really is Rod Gray we probably need to clean up the article regarding the Lady From L.U.S.T. work. It definitely doesn't belong in section 3.3, for example, and isn't cited anywhere in section 6. Kell ( talk) 20:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
In regard to the novel "Escape Across the Cosmos" aka "Titans of the Universe" I think, but am not sure, it was reissued again as "Star Chase" with yet another pen name (Brian James Royal).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gardner Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gardner Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The article includes two lines:
The first suggests that 1,500 is an accurate-ish estimate, whereas the second isn't only claiming what he was "definitely credited with." I believe the first needs an "at least 1,500" in it introduction is probably needed to get them to match. How exhaustive is the source used ("Mike's Amazing World of Comics") because from it Fox only wrote 113 comics for other companies, which isn't the 2,500 suggested in the intro.
While it's worth knowing how high his numbers are, a source that only has a very low estimate may not be very helpful. If he really did, say, 3,000 stories at DC, saying "definitely credited with 1,500" doesn't seem fair to him. Duggy 1138 ( talk) 05:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)