![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think it makes much sense to include web pages that simply describe your own garden railway. There are already good places to do this such as DMOZ or RailUSA to name just two. By all means let's include those sites in the external links, but if we link direct to thousands of personal pages, this will just become a URL list and not an informative, enjoyable article. What do other contributors think? Gwernol 06:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I've removed the links to LSOL.com because this is primarily a subscription site and external links to such sites conflict with WP:EL policy. Gwernol 17:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Per discussions with Gwernol some general information on LSOL.com was added in to talk about the free services, but letting people know that there is a subscription part of the site like a printed magazine.
This article has recently been flagged for Neutrality and Inaccuracy violations, but there is nothing recorded here to explain WHY. Would it not make sense when someone disputes something that they ALSO added a reason here? In the absence of any FACTS I would suggest that the flag needs to be removed. I am currently reviewing a number of my books relating to Garden Railways for suitable citations and will post them shortly Lsces ( talk) 08:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be merged with Backyard railroad? Cullen328 ( talk) 03:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Garden railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is entirely unsourced. Books are cited about the topic, so it is clearly notable, but the whole article is POV original research. It should be deleted and start again. Jdcooper ( talk) 00:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think it makes much sense to include web pages that simply describe your own garden railway. There are already good places to do this such as DMOZ or RailUSA to name just two. By all means let's include those sites in the external links, but if we link direct to thousands of personal pages, this will just become a URL list and not an informative, enjoyable article. What do other contributors think? Gwernol 06:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I've removed the links to LSOL.com because this is primarily a subscription site and external links to such sites conflict with WP:EL policy. Gwernol 17:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Per discussions with Gwernol some general information on LSOL.com was added in to talk about the free services, but letting people know that there is a subscription part of the site like a printed magazine.
This article has recently been flagged for Neutrality and Inaccuracy violations, but there is nothing recorded here to explain WHY. Would it not make sense when someone disputes something that they ALSO added a reason here? In the absence of any FACTS I would suggest that the flag needs to be removed. I am currently reviewing a number of my books relating to Garden Railways for suitable citations and will post them shortly Lsces ( talk) 08:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be merged with Backyard railroad? Cullen328 ( talk) 03:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Garden railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is entirely unsourced. Books are cited about the topic, so it is clearly notable, but the whole article is POV original research. It should be deleted and start again. Jdcooper ( talk) 00:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)