This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gangut-class battleship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Gangut-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Gangut-class battleship is the main article in the Gangut class battleships series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 11, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
French protests caused the
Russians to award the contract for the
Gangut-class
battleship to a Russian firm rather than the
German winner of the 1908 international design contest? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How could the Sovjets transfer a battleship to the Black sea Fleet? Wasn't the Bosporaus Strait off-limits to large warships due to a treaty?
According to the 1945 edition of Jane's this class of ships had icebreaking bows, making them the only icebreaking battleships ever built. The article does hint at this but does not explicitly state so. Is this failure an oversight or is this in some way disputed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk • contribs) 04:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Where did information come about Type Sevastopol ships having name of last ship in series? Which was launched and commissioned last but somehow become lead-ship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GunLinser ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gangut-class battleship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Were the boilers Admiralty or Yarrow types? Recent (unsourced) changes have changed this from Admiralty to Yarrow, and they're not the same thing. Andy Dingley ( talk) 23:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Under "Design and Construction", this article makes reference to a Vickers Dreadnought Design that was almost adopted by the Russian Navy: "The requirements for a new class of dreadnoughts were in a state of flux during 1907, but Vickers Ltd submitted a design that met the latest specifications and was very nearly accepted by the Navy for a 22,000-long-ton (22,000 t) ship with twelve 12-inch (305 mm) guns in triple, superimposed turrets. However rumors of a contract with Vickers raised a public outcry as they had some problems with the armored cruiser Rurik then building in England."
I can find no source referenced for this included in the article. It would be good to have this claim referenced, if only to guide readers interested in looking into it further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C83B:5300:64E4:9134:9266:967F ( talk) 19:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gangut-class battleship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Gangut-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Gangut-class battleship is the main article in the Gangut class battleships series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 11, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
French protests caused the
Russians to award the contract for the
Gangut-class
battleship to a Russian firm rather than the
German winner of the 1908 international design contest? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How could the Sovjets transfer a battleship to the Black sea Fleet? Wasn't the Bosporaus Strait off-limits to large warships due to a treaty?
According to the 1945 edition of Jane's this class of ships had icebreaking bows, making them the only icebreaking battleships ever built. The article does hint at this but does not explicitly state so. Is this failure an oversight or is this in some way disputed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk • contribs) 04:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Where did information come about Type Sevastopol ships having name of last ship in series? Which was launched and commissioned last but somehow become lead-ship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GunLinser ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gangut-class battleship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Were the boilers Admiralty or Yarrow types? Recent (unsourced) changes have changed this from Admiralty to Yarrow, and they're not the same thing. Andy Dingley ( talk) 23:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Under "Design and Construction", this article makes reference to a Vickers Dreadnought Design that was almost adopted by the Russian Navy: "The requirements for a new class of dreadnoughts were in a state of flux during 1907, but Vickers Ltd submitted a design that met the latest specifications and was very nearly accepted by the Navy for a 22,000-long-ton (22,000 t) ship with twelve 12-inch (305 mm) guns in triple, superimposed turrets. However rumors of a contract with Vickers raised a public outcry as they had some problems with the armored cruiser Rurik then building in England."
I can find no source referenced for this included in the article. It would be good to have this claim referenced, if only to guide readers interested in looking into it further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C83B:5300:64E4:9134:9266:967F ( talk) 19:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)