GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs) 06:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe this is stable enough to be a Good Article now. Not so much because of edit warring ( WP:GAFAIL #4), although there has been some, but because the situation is too recent and ongoing to be stable (GAFAIL #1, a long way from meeting GA criterion 5). The main events may have been over after January, but in late February the NYT reported that there were nearly 50 ongoing lawsuits against Robinhood over this ( https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/26/business/robinhood-gamestop.html), two weeks ago GameStop reported a plan for major changes in management structure ( https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gamestop-provides-corporate-governance-130000470.html), and new analysis of what happened and rule-making to address what happened is still coming out. I think we need to wait long enough to have some perspective on the situation before setting this in stone as a good article. Otherwise, either we would pre-empt the addition of later developments (if editors use the GA status as an excuse to prevent changes to the article) or those changes would make any GA review quickly obsolete. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs) 06:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't believe this is stable enough to be a Good Article now. Not so much because of edit warring ( WP:GAFAIL #4), although there has been some, but because the situation is too recent and ongoing to be stable (GAFAIL #1, a long way from meeting GA criterion 5). The main events may have been over after January, but in late February the NYT reported that there were nearly 50 ongoing lawsuits against Robinhood over this ( https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/26/business/robinhood-gamestop.html), two weeks ago GameStop reported a plan for major changes in management structure ( https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gamestop-provides-corporate-governance-130000470.html), and new analysis of what happened and rule-making to address what happened is still coming out. I think we need to wait long enough to have some perspective on the situation before setting this in stone as a good article. Otherwise, either we would pre-empt the addition of later developments (if editors use the GA status as an excuse to prevent changes to the article) or those changes would make any GA review quickly obsolete. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)