The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Vami IV ( talk · contribs) 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use Done,
Fixed,
Added,
Not done,
Doing..., or
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠ 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is... massive, and this review will take a while. Expect me to read a couple sections at a time and to take frequent breaks. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
@ CaptainEek: Captain, I must offer you my apologies, but I cannot continue this review. I have decided to temporarily pull back from Wikipedia for some soul-searching. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I'll start here. The referencing is reliable, but also a mess.
Good Article review progress box
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Vami IV ( talk · contribs) 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use Done,
Fixed,
Added,
Not done,
Doing..., or
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –
♠Vami
_IV†♠ 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is... massive, and this review will take a while. Expect me to read a couple sections at a time and to take frequent breaks. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 03:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
@ CaptainEek: Captain, I must offer you my apologies, but I cannot continue this review. I have decided to temporarily pull back from Wikipedia for some soul-searching. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I'll start here. The referencing is reliable, but also a mess.
Good Article review progress box
|