This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gadianton robbers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetics/ Polemics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetics/ Polemics at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Is there a clear reference for the Gadianton robbers and Lamanites uniting? 219.69.19.70 ( talk) 02:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)grego
A quote is needed for this description: "whose works are good, but who are actually deeply involved in conspiracy and organized crime". Outside of one instance from the letter written between that one guy and the other guy, I am unaware of any claims that they believed their works were good, and never is that definition made clear... for instance, the only way I understood it was that they were good because it lead to financial benefits... I never understood the Gadianton robbers to claim, like the masons do, to be a "good works organization", and so the parallel is somewhat flawed in my view, especially without a quote. myclob ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC).
There are people within the movement, particularly in the RLDS tradition, who believe the Book of Mormon is true AND that the Freemasons are/were rather like modern day Gadianton robbers - that part of the reason the Book of Mormon came forward was to warn us (us meaning the Latter Day Saints) against becoming involved in similar secret combinations. I have also heard criticism from opponents of the Brigham Young-descended factions who compare the Gadianton robbers to the Danites and their means of identification to the secret signs involved in the Utah Mormon temple rituals.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.62 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 6 September 2010 Dafalias ( talk) 11:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC) It is clear from the Book of Mormon that the Gadianton Robbers were not and are not some insignificant little organization. They were and are the super wealthy and powerful.
The article is also ignorant of the fact that it is clearly stated in the Book of Mormon that the secret combinations have existed since Caine. The merely got the name "Gadianton Robbers" in the Ancient Americas.
There's an essay in Brant Gardner's Second Witness vol. 5 on the Gadianton Robbers starting on page 11. The original presentation is available for free from FAIR. FAIR is typically not cited on Wikipedia. Here's the citation to the book:
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gadianton robbers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetics/ Polemics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetics/ Polemics at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Is there a clear reference for the Gadianton robbers and Lamanites uniting? 219.69.19.70 ( talk) 02:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)grego
A quote is needed for this description: "whose works are good, but who are actually deeply involved in conspiracy and organized crime". Outside of one instance from the letter written between that one guy and the other guy, I am unaware of any claims that they believed their works were good, and never is that definition made clear... for instance, the only way I understood it was that they were good because it lead to financial benefits... I never understood the Gadianton robbers to claim, like the masons do, to be a "good works organization", and so the parallel is somewhat flawed in my view, especially without a quote. myclob ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC).
There are people within the movement, particularly in the RLDS tradition, who believe the Book of Mormon is true AND that the Freemasons are/were rather like modern day Gadianton robbers - that part of the reason the Book of Mormon came forward was to warn us (us meaning the Latter Day Saints) against becoming involved in similar secret combinations. I have also heard criticism from opponents of the Brigham Young-descended factions who compare the Gadianton robbers to the Danites and their means of identification to the secret signs involved in the Utah Mormon temple rituals.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.62 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 6 September 2010 Dafalias ( talk) 11:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC) It is clear from the Book of Mormon that the Gadianton Robbers were not and are not some insignificant little organization. They were and are the super wealthy and powerful.
The article is also ignorant of the fact that it is clearly stated in the Book of Mormon that the secret combinations have existed since Caine. The merely got the name "Gadianton Robbers" in the Ancient Americas.
There's an essay in Brant Gardner's Second Witness vol. 5 on the Gadianton Robbers starting on page 11. The original presentation is available for free from FAIR. FAIR is typically not cited on Wikipedia. Here's the citation to the book: