This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Can somebody explain why is Liiceanu included in the category "People of the Romanian Revolution of 1989" and which are the sources to support that?--
MariusM 20:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)reply
"Andreescu Critique" Legitimacy
The section, first and foremost, should not be a 'section'. It should, at most, be integrated somewhere in the article’s main body of text. Furthermore, I see no real bibliographical sustenance behind Andreescu's attack, which appears biographically-informed and thus verging close to illegitimacy. Clearly Liiceanu's philosophical/intellectual legacy - as one of Paltinis School's main contemporary exponent - should be expounded on! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
95.76.253.186 (
talk) 11:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
How's mass marketing of fascist propaganda irrelevant? Wir haben es nicht gewusst would be a very lame excuse for him not knowing what his publishing house did year after year.
Tgeorgescu (
talk) 12:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
"Andreescu Critique"
If the section should legitimately be deleted, then it needs to be discussed here for consensus first. Arbitrary section blanking gets anti-vandalism reverts, as can be seen from the edit history.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Can somebody explain why is Liiceanu included in the category "People of the Romanian Revolution of 1989" and which are the sources to support that?--
MariusM 20:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)reply
"Andreescu Critique" Legitimacy
The section, first and foremost, should not be a 'section'. It should, at most, be integrated somewhere in the article’s main body of text. Furthermore, I see no real bibliographical sustenance behind Andreescu's attack, which appears biographically-informed and thus verging close to illegitimacy. Clearly Liiceanu's philosophical/intellectual legacy - as one of Paltinis School's main contemporary exponent - should be expounded on! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
95.76.253.186 (
talk) 11:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
How's mass marketing of fascist propaganda irrelevant? Wir haben es nicht gewusst would be a very lame excuse for him not knowing what his publishing house did year after year.
Tgeorgescu (
talk) 12:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)reply
"Andreescu Critique"
If the section should legitimately be deleted, then it needs to be discussed here for consensus first. Arbitrary section blanking gets anti-vandalism reverts, as can be seen from the edit history.