This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Requested move 4 June 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. No opposition raised. If someone wants to query it within a reasonable time frame, let me know. (
non-admin closure)
TonyBallioni (
talk) 20:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Deletion
No deleting: The IT-Company is one of the largest in Germany; especially awarded from the EU (IPACSO) because of their innovations! --
46.189.28.218 (
talk) 07:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
You may remove Prod template yourself, but this article will not survive AfD without good reliable sources about this company.
Pavlor (
talk) 09:35, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Heise.de covers this company by short-news at least since 2008:
[1] ct magazine has several reviews of their software. I also found some articles about their 30th anniversary:
[2],
[3] (note there are more similar, but they were clear PR or advert, ruhr-zeit.de may be also one of these...). What I found most interesting, this company started on Atari ST market and my brief search shows several software (and even hardware!) products from German company "G Data" with reviews in Atari magazines of that time. Maybe this arcticle can be saved after all...
Pavlor (
talk) 15:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Does this mean we close the Deletion now? --
46.189.28.218 (
talk) 13:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
This is not deletion discussion (AfD), but proposed deletion. Anyone (including yourself) can remove Prod (proposed deletion) template from the article. However, any editor can then nominate this article for deletion and notability of its subject will be judged by broader Wikipedia community. I will add references to RS during this week and then maybe remove Prod, but you can do the same just now.
Pavlor (
talk) 15:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment Neutral to the move. I would wait until some RSs start to use this name, but this may take ages (notability of this company is borderline anyway).
Pavlor (
talk) 11:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Requested move 4 June 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. No opposition raised. If someone wants to query it within a reasonable time frame, let me know. (
non-admin closure)
TonyBallioni (
talk) 20:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Deletion
No deleting: The IT-Company is one of the largest in Germany; especially awarded from the EU (IPACSO) because of their innovations! --
46.189.28.218 (
talk) 07:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
You may remove Prod template yourself, but this article will not survive AfD without good reliable sources about this company.
Pavlor (
talk) 09:35, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Heise.de covers this company by short-news at least since 2008:
[1] ct magazine has several reviews of their software. I also found some articles about their 30th anniversary:
[2],
[3] (note there are more similar, but they were clear PR or advert, ruhr-zeit.de may be also one of these...). What I found most interesting, this company started on Atari ST market and my brief search shows several software (and even hardware!) products from German company "G Data" with reviews in Atari magazines of that time. Maybe this arcticle can be saved after all...
Pavlor (
talk) 15:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Does this mean we close the Deletion now? --
46.189.28.218 (
talk) 13:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
This is not deletion discussion (AfD), but proposed deletion. Anyone (including yourself) can remove Prod (proposed deletion) template from the article. However, any editor can then nominate this article for deletion and notability of its subject will be judged by broader Wikipedia community. I will add references to RS during this week and then maybe remove Prod, but you can do the same just now.
Pavlor (
talk) 15:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment Neutral to the move. I would wait until some RSs start to use this name, but this may take ages (notability of this company is borderline anyway).
Pavlor (
talk) 11:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.