![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should libbfd be described in this article or in GNU Debugger? Gronky 13:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR ( talk) 07:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
GNU Binary Utilities → GNU Binutils — GNU Binutils is the most popular name. — Chealer ( talk) 23:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I'm unsure about this one. GNU Binary Utilities would be understood by many such as myself who have never heard of the proposed new name. Surely we're writing primarily for the most general audience? No vote as yet. Andrewa ( talk) 09:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I see nothing in the article which supports this claim, yet it's stated that GNU Binutils was started by people working for Cygnus. I'm sure they have contributed but afaik, Stallman started the GNU project, (meaning he started the binutils project -- which is a pretty core piece of software in any operating system). Can someone confirm this claim? FrederikHertzum ( talk) 21:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should libbfd be described in this article or in GNU Debugger? Gronky 13:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR ( talk) 07:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
GNU Binary Utilities → GNU Binutils — GNU Binutils is the most popular name. — Chealer ( talk) 23:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I'm unsure about this one. GNU Binary Utilities would be understood by many such as myself who have never heard of the proposed new name. Surely we're writing primarily for the most general audience? No vote as yet. Andrewa ( talk) 09:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I see nothing in the article which supports this claim, yet it's stated that GNU Binutils was started by people working for Cygnus. I'm sure they have contributed but afaik, Stallman started the GNU project, (meaning he started the binutils project -- which is a pretty core piece of software in any operating system). Can someone confirm this claim? FrederikHertzum ( talk) 21:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)