 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Closed. No support for the first proposal and a second proposed target was added. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
GMV, S.A. → GMV — This is the correct name for the company. Rrlc ( talk) 13:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose GMV ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) already exists as a page, and not a redirect. 76.66.200.95 ( talk) 06:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
GMV, S.A. → GMV Innovating Solutions — 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
To editor Rrlc: I appreciate your concern about the corruption sanction being given too much importance in the context of the parent company's history. It's not something we can avoid covering, or hide behind a vague header, but we can reduce its relative weight – by expanding on the rest of the company's history. If you can produce neutrally-worded, reliably-sourced content of encyclopedic value on the corporate history outside this event, you are welcome to add it. — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 13:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I totally agree with Swpb. Loranchet ( talk) 10:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Closed. No support for the first proposal and a second proposed target was added. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
GMV, S.A. → GMV — This is the correct name for the company. Rrlc ( talk) 13:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose GMV ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) already exists as a page, and not a redirect. 76.66.200.95 ( talk) 06:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 14:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
GMV, S.A. → GMV Innovating Solutions — 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
To editor Rrlc: I appreciate your concern about the corruption sanction being given too much importance in the context of the parent company's history. It's not something we can avoid covering, or hide behind a vague header, but we can reduce its relative weight – by expanding on the rest of the company's history. If you can produce neutrally-worded, reliably-sourced content of encyclopedic value on the corporate history outside this event, you are welcome to add it. — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 13:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I totally agree with Swpb. Loranchet ( talk) 10:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)