This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are reasons to doubt the centre-right position of GERB. The doubtful fact is GERB's memnership in the EPP, so I propose to have that as Gerb's location in the lefty-right spectrum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mircha ( talk • contribs) 14:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Putting nationalism as one of GERB's ideologies?! What kind of a sick joke is this?! This is a serious case of vandalizing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6800:FF73:8085:4D62:382D:BA8E:B4F9 ( talk) 16:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
What "source"?! The reference was empty, without a link. And even, if there is a "source" claiming that GERB is a nationalist party, so what?! You can probably find a "source" that can dub Hitler - a humanist, Bush - a communist, or Schwarzenegger - a woman! Please inform yourselves, please stop flooding Wikipedia with ridiculous disinformation, please stop vandalizing Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6800:FF73:8085:98F8:5EA8:FB3D:3D88 ( talk) 12:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
I suggest that this page is locked for editing by unregistered members, due to the incredibly complex political situation in Bulgaria. I fear that history will be "touched up", for the purposes of forming a new political leader. Georgi Marinov. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.241.138.141 ( talk) 11:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Weird at first glance but there you go. Jenks24 ( talk) 14:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Please change in article name of party. It is stated that only name of party is "ГЕРБ". it was similar situation with Czech ANO and TOP09 partie's names which aren't abbrevation.
Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria → GERB – GERB (Cyrillic ГЕРБ) seems to be a " pseudo-acronym" or "orphan initialism" like BP, AT&T, KFC or Czech ANO 2011 and TOP 09 parties. The party seems not to use the full name "Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria" any more. -- originally proposed by User:Aight 2009 at 08:45, on 2 June 2014
Support: GERB is registered with the Central Electoral Commission as "PP GERB" (Political Party GERB): http://results.cik.bg/ep2014/rezultati . -- Kndimov ( talk) 17:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Support:So I think that article name should be GERB but it should be mentioned that party is registered as PP GERB Aight 2009 ( talk) 07:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Already all Bulgarian parties are PP at first name so it is no need to include it to the name. Aight 2009 ( talk) 15:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
GERB. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
As suggested by the admins, I decided to bring my dispute with 85.196.176.223 in the hope that more editors belonging to the Elections and Referendums WikiProject will help me settle the matter. As I pointed out in the past, I believe that 85.196.176.223 is engaging in a series of disruptive edits of this page. More specifically, he keeps insisting that in the electoral history section of GERB the seat count should refer to the whole GERB-SDS coalition, while according to me (and according to the usual implicit rules followed in these situations) the seat count should refer solely to the seats held by GERB, while those held by the coalition as a whole should be inserted in the coalition page.
In support of my stance I can bring numerous examples, but I'll stick to two for practical reasons: a Bulgarian one (the Democratic Bulgaria coalition and its members), and an international one (the Greek KINAL coalition and its members). In support of his stance, 85.196.176.223 brings his personal, subjective perception that GERB's coalition member, SDS, is too irrelevant and deserves to be incorporated into GERB. Now, creating ad hoc exceptions to consensus rules based solely on one user's perception seems to me quite unnecessary and in contrast with Wikipedia's usual line of work, but I'm open to feedbacks from other users. Fm3dici97 ( talk) 21:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are reasons to doubt the centre-right position of GERB. The doubtful fact is GERB's memnership in the EPP, so I propose to have that as Gerb's location in the lefty-right spectrum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mircha ( talk • contribs) 14:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Putting nationalism as one of GERB's ideologies?! What kind of a sick joke is this?! This is a serious case of vandalizing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6800:FF73:8085:4D62:382D:BA8E:B4F9 ( talk) 16:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
What "source"?! The reference was empty, without a link. And even, if there is a "source" claiming that GERB is a nationalist party, so what?! You can probably find a "source" that can dub Hitler - a humanist, Bush - a communist, or Schwarzenegger - a woman! Please inform yourselves, please stop flooding Wikipedia with ridiculous disinformation, please stop vandalizing Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6800:FF73:8085:98F8:5EA8:FB3D:3D88 ( talk) 12:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
I suggest that this page is locked for editing by unregistered members, due to the incredibly complex political situation in Bulgaria. I fear that history will be "touched up", for the purposes of forming a new political leader. Georgi Marinov. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.241.138.141 ( talk) 11:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Weird at first glance but there you go. Jenks24 ( talk) 14:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Please change in article name of party. It is stated that only name of party is "ГЕРБ". it was similar situation with Czech ANO and TOP09 partie's names which aren't abbrevation.
Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria → GERB – GERB (Cyrillic ГЕРБ) seems to be a " pseudo-acronym" or "orphan initialism" like BP, AT&T, KFC or Czech ANO 2011 and TOP 09 parties. The party seems not to use the full name "Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria" any more. -- originally proposed by User:Aight 2009 at 08:45, on 2 June 2014
Support: GERB is registered with the Central Electoral Commission as "PP GERB" (Political Party GERB): http://results.cik.bg/ep2014/rezultati . -- Kndimov ( talk) 17:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Support:So I think that article name should be GERB but it should be mentioned that party is registered as PP GERB Aight 2009 ( talk) 07:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Already all Bulgarian parties are PP at first name so it is no need to include it to the name. Aight 2009 ( talk) 15:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
GERB. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
As suggested by the admins, I decided to bring my dispute with 85.196.176.223 in the hope that more editors belonging to the Elections and Referendums WikiProject will help me settle the matter. As I pointed out in the past, I believe that 85.196.176.223 is engaging in a series of disruptive edits of this page. More specifically, he keeps insisting that in the electoral history section of GERB the seat count should refer to the whole GERB-SDS coalition, while according to me (and according to the usual implicit rules followed in these situations) the seat count should refer solely to the seats held by GERB, while those held by the coalition as a whole should be inserted in the coalition page.
In support of my stance I can bring numerous examples, but I'll stick to two for practical reasons: a Bulgarian one (the Democratic Bulgaria coalition and its members), and an international one (the Greek KINAL coalition and its members). In support of his stance, 85.196.176.223 brings his personal, subjective perception that GERB's coalition member, SDS, is too irrelevant and deserves to be incorporated into GERB. Now, creating ad hoc exceptions to consensus rules based solely on one user's perception seems to me quite unnecessary and in contrast with Wikipedia's usual line of work, but I'm open to feedbacks from other users. Fm3dici97 ( talk) 21:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)