![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I added this word to the article as I believe it is debatable as to whether Telstra ever intended on actually going through with the proposal. Ensign R 01:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Who reverted the part that G9 were upgrading "Australia's telecommunications infrastructure"? They are only adding to it, and only a small part as they are not touching switching at all. Also they do want a monopoly with Telstra not allowed to build in competition, and they do want to steal Telstra's existing infrastructure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.96.127 ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
If you read the PDF's that G9 submitted you would have seen "Ensuring that there is only one FTTN network" - as G9 does not want competition and as to stealing all Telstra's customers "Cutover of all copper pairs at a node" - it appears that you work for one of the G9 companies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.246.49 ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe that there is a person pushing pov on this article, below are a list of IPs that I believe all belong to the same person pushing pov. All the IPs resolve to an IP in Sydney.
-- Adam1213 Talk 06:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It is just posting facts about the G9 SAU, but Telstra bashers like you cannot handle the facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.77.170 ( talk • contribs) 13:16, 19 November 2007
If you can find the proposal on the G9 / optus /government web sites and can point out where it confirms your claims you are free to post them properly citing your reference. --
Adam1213
Talk
05:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
The link is already posted, but in yopur Telstra bashing you ignore it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.77.170 ( talk) 07:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I added this word to the article as I believe it is debatable as to whether Telstra ever intended on actually going through with the proposal. Ensign R 01:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Who reverted the part that G9 were upgrading "Australia's telecommunications infrastructure"? They are only adding to it, and only a small part as they are not touching switching at all. Also they do want a monopoly with Telstra not allowed to build in competition, and they do want to steal Telstra's existing infrastructure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.96.127 ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
If you read the PDF's that G9 submitted you would have seen "Ensuring that there is only one FTTN network" - as G9 does not want competition and as to stealing all Telstra's customers "Cutover of all copper pairs at a node" - it appears that you work for one of the G9 companies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.246.49 ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe that there is a person pushing pov on this article, below are a list of IPs that I believe all belong to the same person pushing pov. All the IPs resolve to an IP in Sydney.
-- Adam1213 Talk 06:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It is just posting facts about the G9 SAU, but Telstra bashers like you cannot handle the facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.77.170 ( talk • contribs) 13:16, 19 November 2007
If you can find the proposal on the G9 / optus /government web sites and can point out where it confirms your claims you are free to post them properly citing your reference. --
Adam1213
Talk
05:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
The link is already posted, but in yopur Telstra bashing you ignore it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.77.170 ( talk) 07:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)