This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Günther Lütjens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 25, 2019. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Re: edit summary ( "opinion"), the removed external links were of dubious accuracy; please see WP:EXT. The article is quite extensive, and these links do not provide anything useful.
Additionally, a consensus is not required to remove external links; please see WP:NOCONSENSUS, specifically:
Hope this clarifies. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Dapi, you call them "useful links to databases", but these are personal, self-published web sites of unknown accuracy. The links in question are:
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)For example, one of them ( http://www.battleshipbismarck.info/about.htm states: "This website was created by Aziz Evliyaoglu in 2000. Later it changed ownership on the 7th of November, 2005. Calcio Network © Copyright 2000 - 2007". Another one is http://www.maritimequest.com/ "© 2005-2017 Michael W. Pocock and MaritimeQuest.com". I don't see linking to these sites being of service to the readers.
In any case, I've requested a WP:3O. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
About the Third Opinion Request: The request for a 3O has been removed (i.e. rejected). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, 3O requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. With one editor having made only one comment, above, no thorough back-and-forth discussion has occurred here. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 05:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Please see WP:EXT:
No justification was presented, so I will remove the links. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add the IPA of name's pronounciation. Propatriamori ( talk) 12:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Günther Lütjens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 25, 2019. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Re: edit summary ( "opinion"), the removed external links were of dubious accuracy; please see WP:EXT. The article is quite extensive, and these links do not provide anything useful.
Additionally, a consensus is not required to remove external links; please see WP:NOCONSENSUS, specifically:
Hope this clarifies. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Dapi, you call them "useful links to databases", but these are personal, self-published web sites of unknown accuracy. The links in question are:
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)For example, one of them ( http://www.battleshipbismarck.info/about.htm states: "This website was created by Aziz Evliyaoglu in 2000. Later it changed ownership on the 7th of November, 2005. Calcio Network © Copyright 2000 - 2007". Another one is http://www.maritimequest.com/ "© 2005-2017 Michael W. Pocock and MaritimeQuest.com". I don't see linking to these sites being of service to the readers.
In any case, I've requested a WP:3O. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
About the Third Opinion Request: The request for a 3O has been removed (i.e. rejected). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, 3O requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. With one editor having made only one comment, above, no thorough back-and-forth discussion has occurred here. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 05:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Please see WP:EXT:
No justification was presented, so I will remove the links. K.e.coffman ( talk) 22:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add the IPA of name's pronounciation. Propatriamori ( talk) 12:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)