![]() | Gökböri has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 19, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gökböri article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
@ Urselius: You reverted my edit with the comment "Not a typo - spelling of the title and standard British English variant - closer to Greco-Roman origins of the word)" I assume this was intended for someone else, since my edit that you reverted was removing an extraneous space from inside of a ref tag (which, really, shouldn't be there).--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gog the Mild ( talk · contribs) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
More to follow. Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
I have done a little copy editing which you will wish to check.
Alt text: optional, but covered under MOS:ALT.
I have carried out a limited number of spot checks, which raise no issues.
Earwig gives a green light re plagiarism.
Focused on the subject. NPoV and stable.
A very nice little article. Is it headed for FAC? Gog the Mild ( talk) 18:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Good work. Promoting. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
@
Urselius, according to
MOS:HEAD, Section headings should generally follow the guidance for article titles
, which includes
WP:CONCISE. It should not redundantly refer back to the subject of the article, e.g., Early life, not Smith's early life or His early life.
You have also restored an unsourced addition and reverted another edit of mine where I've removed redundant repetition of his name, which you have not addressed in your edit summary.
Aintabli (
talk)
14:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Gökböri has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 19, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gökböri article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
@ Urselius: You reverted my edit with the comment "Not a typo - spelling of the title and standard British English variant - closer to Greco-Roman origins of the word)" I assume this was intended for someone else, since my edit that you reverted was removing an extraneous space from inside of a ref tag (which, really, shouldn't be there).--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gog the Mild ( talk · contribs) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
More to follow. Gog the Mild ( talk) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
I have done a little copy editing which you will wish to check.
Alt text: optional, but covered under MOS:ALT.
I have carried out a limited number of spot checks, which raise no issues.
Earwig gives a green light re plagiarism.
Focused on the subject. NPoV and stable.
A very nice little article. Is it headed for FAC? Gog the Mild ( talk) 18:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Good work. Promoting. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
@
Urselius, according to
MOS:HEAD, Section headings should generally follow the guidance for article titles
, which includes
WP:CONCISE. It should not redundantly refer back to the subject of the article, e.g., Early life, not Smith's early life or His early life.
You have also restored an unsourced addition and reverted another edit of mine where I've removed redundant repetition of his name, which you have not addressed in your edit summary.
Aintabli (
talk)
14:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)