Furry Pirates is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to
furry fandom. For more information, visit the
project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
I don't mean to contradict, but the Pyramid review is merely a sample, giving only background information on the game and irrelevant information about the reviewer discovering it. It stops just shy of talking about the game (beyond the brief summary in the first paragraph) I misread, that's just them talking about a con in Atlanta. Do you suppose there can still be a use for it?
Squeeyote (
talk)
23:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The sample is a sample of the actual, full-length review. Unfortunately, Volume II of Pyramid doesn't have a readily available, free, online format, but that doesn't diminish the relevance of the review - and this is the only way of citing it online at present (I read the full review back in the day, but on a subscription basis and don't currently have access.)
Newimpartial (
talk)
23:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
If you attest that it's worthwhile to cite, I won't mess with it. Unless of course the full review pops up in a freely available format so that I can replace it with a link to that instead.
Squeeyote (
talk)
01:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Furry Pirates is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to
furry fandom. For more information, visit the
project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
I don't mean to contradict, but the Pyramid review is merely a sample, giving only background information on the game and irrelevant information about the reviewer discovering it. It stops just shy of talking about the game (beyond the brief summary in the first paragraph) I misread, that's just them talking about a con in Atlanta. Do you suppose there can still be a use for it?
Squeeyote (
talk)
23:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The sample is a sample of the actual, full-length review. Unfortunately, Volume II of Pyramid doesn't have a readily available, free, online format, but that doesn't diminish the relevance of the review - and this is the only way of citing it online at present (I read the full review back in the day, but on a subscription basis and don't currently have access.)
Newimpartial (
talk)
23:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
If you attest that it's worthwhile to cite, I won't mess with it. Unless of course the full review pops up in a freely available format so that I can replace it with a link to that instead.
Squeeyote (
talk)
01:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)reply
