![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
![]() | Gavin Munro was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Full Grown. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Netherzone diff Will you please give a link to the relevant policy and how you think it applies to the multiple cited content that you removed. Blackash ( talk) 12:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention. Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention. Prices and product availability can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers.
The idea of growing trees for 50 years then cut them into small pieces glue together in ways that can only ever fall apartdidn't seem to make much sense. Netherzone ( talk) 15:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
"an independent source and a justified reason for the mention"These sentences had been added following multiple refs not just the ones cited. The refs given are from independent sources and are far from the only ones talking about price. When a creation is so vastly new or artistic people want to know what it sells for. We are always asked about the price of our art, right after asking about our shaping method and followed by how does long does it take.
"Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention."The Refs are are also mainstream and are not product reviews. Most refs for this are long articles in their own right talking about different aspects of Full Grown, their owners, and their products.
"not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers."There isn't any real competing products and a Full Grown item is unique. So it not about Comparisons.
"Improve pages wherever you can, and do not worry about leaving them imperfect. Preserve the value that others add, even if they "did it wrong" (try to fix it rather than delete it)."Blackash ( talk) 16:09, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
References
fastcodesign
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).bbc
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
![]() | Gavin Munro was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Full Grown. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Netherzone diff Will you please give a link to the relevant policy and how you think it applies to the multiple cited content that you removed. Blackash ( talk) 12:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention. Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention. Prices and product availability can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers.
The idea of growing trees for 50 years then cut them into small pieces glue together in ways that can only ever fall apartdidn't seem to make much sense. Netherzone ( talk) 15:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
"an independent source and a justified reason for the mention"These sentences had been added following multiple refs not just the ones cited. The refs given are from independent sources and are far from the only ones talking about price. When a creation is so vastly new or artistic people want to know what it sells for. We are always asked about the price of our art, right after asking about our shaping method and followed by how does long does it take.
"Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention."The Refs are are also mainstream and are not product reviews. Most refs for this are long articles in their own right talking about different aspects of Full Grown, their owners, and their products.
"not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers."There isn't any real competing products and a Full Grown item is unique. So it not about Comparisons.
"Improve pages wherever you can, and do not worry about leaving them imperfect. Preserve the value that others add, even if they "did it wrong" (try to fix it rather than delete it)."Blackash ( talk) 16:09, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
References
fastcodesign
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).bbc
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).