![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
To quote: Fuchsia is designed to run on a variety of devices, including mobile phones and personal computers. and in the info box it says Marketing target IoT. Now these aren't completely exclusive, but I think it should be cleared up, because that sounds like "everything", in which case it maybe should be labeled a general purpose operating system. Also does Google really market the OS (yet)?-- Athaba ( talk) 17:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Fuchsia is described by Google as "Pink + Purple == Fuchsia (a new Operating System)."
add to article ? -- Ne0 ( talk) 09:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
For nearly every logo exists in the Wikipedia an SVG file.
But the Fuchsia Logo is an 200x200 pixel png file.
Possible it was taken from the github page of Fuchsia
https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/
https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/12826430?v=3&s=200
https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/12826430
But the image on github have a different color.
It seems, that the first version in large size was published at
https://twitter.com/chrismckillop/status/841910948063506432
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68Rg2MW0AAYnm-.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68Rg2MW0AAYnm-.png:large
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.122.137 (
talk)
17:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
There you can also see, that it was created with an vector graphic program.
So an SVG-file of it is still missing.
It is possible to create with this
http://image.online-convert.com/convert-to-svg
from the png file an svg file. But if you zoon in, you see edges.
So the svg file have to be really drawn, not automatical generated. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.125.14 (
talk)
12:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible it could be linked to or could be taken some informations from the Google Fuchsia Wiki
https://fuchsia.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.125.229 (
talk)
17:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Fuchsia is stated in this list but I cannot find any proof/reference that it can be really considered as an RTOS (having a μ-Kernel does not necessarily include this assumption).
^^^^^---- Fuchsia appears here
Holzkohlengrill ( talk) 20:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Fuchsia is not an RTOS. The "RTOS" in the sidebar next to kernel, and the RTOS category bar at the bottom, are incorrect and should be removed. You can talk to the Google employees developing it here if you have questions. Habanero-tan ( talk) 17:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Fuchsia's GUI was removed, so this should be mentioned [1] [2]. In the first paragraph, it is mentioned that Fuchsia had a GUI added "In May 2017, Fuchsia was updated with a user interface" and I feel it should be mentioned this is no longer the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.86.237 ( talk) 16:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
References
There appears to be enough evidence to support this beyond speculation https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/07/03/googles_fuchsia_os_flutters_into_view/ - Splinemath ( talk) 16:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes I know the policy saying that official names aren't necessarily the best. But in this case I think the official name, which seems to be simply " Fuchsia", is the best. Here's why.
Okay sorry for the long rant. "Google Fuchsia" just seems wrong because a) it's not the official name, b) many sources don't use it (they say "Google's Fuchsia", or just "Fuchsia"), c) it's not consistent with Fedora (operating system) (not "Red Hat Fedora"), or even Steam (service) (not "Valve Steam"), or Xbox (console) (not "Microsoft Xbox"), or MacBook Pro (not "Apple MacBook Pro"). – CyclingFan1234 ( talk) 03:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The statement 'The GitHub project suggests Fuchsia can run ...' might be misleading since the GitHub mirror of the project was recently removed. Earlier: https://web.archive.org/web/20190108025553/https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror Now: https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhav256 ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Fuchsia is by definition a microkernel, not a hybrid kernel.
Why was that change made and accepted? 2601:405:4901:770:3DA6:AC36:FE20:5C0 ( talk) 19:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
To quote: Fuchsia is designed to run on a variety of devices, including mobile phones and personal computers. and in the info box it says Marketing target IoT. Now these aren't completely exclusive, but I think it should be cleared up, because that sounds like "everything", in which case it maybe should be labeled a general purpose operating system. Also does Google really market the OS (yet)?-- Athaba ( talk) 17:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Fuchsia is described by Google as "Pink + Purple == Fuchsia (a new Operating System)."
add to article ? -- Ne0 ( talk) 09:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
For nearly every logo exists in the Wikipedia an SVG file.
But the Fuchsia Logo is an 200x200 pixel png file.
Possible it was taken from the github page of Fuchsia
https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror/
https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/12826430?v=3&s=200
https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/12826430
But the image on github have a different color.
It seems, that the first version in large size was published at
https://twitter.com/chrismckillop/status/841910948063506432
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68Rg2MW0AAYnm-.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68Rg2MW0AAYnm-.png:large
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.122.137 (
talk)
17:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
There you can also see, that it was created with an vector graphic program.
So an SVG-file of it is still missing.
It is possible to create with this
http://image.online-convert.com/convert-to-svg
from the png file an svg file. But if you zoon in, you see edges.
So the svg file have to be really drawn, not automatical generated. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.125.14 (
talk)
12:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible it could be linked to or could be taken some informations from the Google Fuchsia Wiki
https://fuchsia.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.226.125.229 (
talk)
17:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Fuchsia is stated in this list but I cannot find any proof/reference that it can be really considered as an RTOS (having a μ-Kernel does not necessarily include this assumption).
^^^^^---- Fuchsia appears here
Holzkohlengrill ( talk) 20:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Fuchsia is not an RTOS. The "RTOS" in the sidebar next to kernel, and the RTOS category bar at the bottom, are incorrect and should be removed. You can talk to the Google employees developing it here if you have questions. Habanero-tan ( talk) 17:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Fuchsia's GUI was removed, so this should be mentioned [1] [2]. In the first paragraph, it is mentioned that Fuchsia had a GUI added "In May 2017, Fuchsia was updated with a user interface" and I feel it should be mentioned this is no longer the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.86.237 ( talk) 16:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
References
There appears to be enough evidence to support this beyond speculation https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/07/03/googles_fuchsia_os_flutters_into_view/ - Splinemath ( talk) 16:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes I know the policy saying that official names aren't necessarily the best. But in this case I think the official name, which seems to be simply " Fuchsia", is the best. Here's why.
Okay sorry for the long rant. "Google Fuchsia" just seems wrong because a) it's not the official name, b) many sources don't use it (they say "Google's Fuchsia", or just "Fuchsia"), c) it's not consistent with Fedora (operating system) (not "Red Hat Fedora"), or even Steam (service) (not "Valve Steam"), or Xbox (console) (not "Microsoft Xbox"), or MacBook Pro (not "Apple MacBook Pro"). – CyclingFan1234 ( talk) 03:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The statement 'The GitHub project suggests Fuchsia can run ...' might be misleading since the GitHub mirror of the project was recently removed. Earlier: https://web.archive.org/web/20190108025553/https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror Now: https://github.com/fuchsia-mirror — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhav256 ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Fuchsia is by definition a microkernel, not a hybrid kernel.
Why was that change made and accepted? 2601:405:4901:770:3DA6:AC36:FE20:5C0 ( talk) 19:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)