This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The arrows in the upper scheme are not correct. The top arrow needs to point right and vice versa.
The bottom scheme does not show that the compound in scheme 1 is actually used as a catalyst (as described in the text).
There is also a source missing for the relevant reactions.
Please correct! --
Klaproth (
talk) 08:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Another reason that articles such as this are guided by WP:SECONDARY and even better WP:TERTIARY. Cite only books and reviews. Wikipedia is not competing with review journals. Editors are relatively unable to decide which of the 5200+ references to cite. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 17:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Leave out English (or any language). Check out our manual of style. That way the figure can be used in other Wikis. Its the way to help Wikipedia be internationally attuned. See figues in ACIE.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 19:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The article should explain who (what scientists or institutions) are responsible for identifying this phenomenon. Don't just leave it to readers to dig through the primary sources. Particularly if the researchers won or are likely to win prizes for this work. 2603:400A:0:7EC:0:0:801E:1C14 ( talk) 17:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The arrows in the upper scheme are not correct. The top arrow needs to point right and vice versa.
The bottom scheme does not show that the compound in scheme 1 is actually used as a catalyst (as described in the text).
There is also a source missing for the relevant reactions.
Please correct! --
Klaproth (
talk) 08:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Another reason that articles such as this are guided by WP:SECONDARY and even better WP:TERTIARY. Cite only books and reviews. Wikipedia is not competing with review journals. Editors are relatively unable to decide which of the 5200+ references to cite. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 17:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Leave out English (or any language). Check out our manual of style. That way the figure can be used in other Wikis. Its the way to help Wikipedia be internationally attuned. See figues in ACIE.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 19:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The article should explain who (what scientists or institutions) are responsible for identifying this phenomenon. Don't just leave it to readers to dig through the primary sources. Particularly if the researchers won or are likely to win prizes for this work. 2603:400A:0:7EC:0:0:801E:1C14 ( talk) 17:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)