From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should Merge into Frigg Article

Most of this article should be merged into the recently rewritten Frigg article and/or is redundant in the face of a solid Anglo-Saxon paganism article. The Frigg article needs expanding, and some of the material found here would be very helpful in doing so. :bloodofox: ( talk) 16:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Neopaganism section is an irrelevant canard

I had already pared off two Neopagan /Wiccan sub sections here and now looking at it the remaining section about Contemporary Paganism seems itself to be largely irrelevant to the the topics of this article. Earrach ( talk) 21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should Merge into Frigg Article

Most of this article should be merged into the recently rewritten Frigg article and/or is redundant in the face of a solid Anglo-Saxon paganism article. The Frigg article needs expanding, and some of the material found here would be very helpful in doing so. :bloodofox: ( talk) 16:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Neopaganism section is an irrelevant canard

I had already pared off two Neopagan /Wiccan sub sections here and now looking at it the remaining section about Contemporary Paganism seems itself to be largely irrelevant to the the topics of this article. Earrach ( talk) 21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook