This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Most of this article should be merged into the recently rewritten
Frigg article and/or is redundant in the face of a solid
Anglo-Saxon paganism article. The Frigg article needs expanding, and some of the material found here would be very helpful in doing so.
:bloodofox: (
talk)
16:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Neopaganism section is an irrelevant canard
I had already pared off two Neopagan /Wiccan sub sections here and now looking at it the remaining section about Contemporary Paganism seems itself to be largely irrelevant to the the topics of this article.
Earrach (
talk)
21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply
This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Most of this article should be merged into the recently rewritten
Frigg article and/or is redundant in the face of a solid
Anglo-Saxon paganism article. The Frigg article needs expanding, and some of the material found here would be very helpful in doing so.
:bloodofox: (
talk)
16:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Neopaganism section is an irrelevant canard
I had already pared off two Neopagan /Wiccan sub sections here and now looking at it the remaining section about Contemporary Paganism seems itself to be largely irrelevant to the the topics of this article.
Earrach (
talk)
21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)reply