 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Notability
Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found: link, just a few passing mentions.
No de.Wiki article. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect.
K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Notable due to his status as a Flying ace with a high claimed kills counts. As you can see in List of World War II flying aces - flyers with a much smaller kill count have articles - with the notability being their kill count and nothing else. Being an aerial ace (with a significant count for a particular conflict - 5 would be borderline for WWII, but would confer significance in any other conflict - mid-double digits and up for WWII is clearly significant). Icewhiz ( talk) 09:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Notability
Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found: link, just a few passing mentions.
No de.Wiki article. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect.
K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Notable due to his status as a Flying ace with a high claimed kills counts. As you can see in List of World War II flying aces - flyers with a much smaller kill count have articles - with the notability being their kill count and nothing else. Being an aerial ace (with a significant count for a particular conflict - 5 would be borderline for WWII, but would confer significance in any other conflict - mid-double digits and up for WWII is clearly significant). Icewhiz ( talk) 09:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)