![]() | French submarine X has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 27, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
French submarine X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of X (1904) from pl.wikipedia. |
![]() | A fact from French submarine X appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 December 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jalapeño ( talk · contribs) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this one. (Review version: 1177229354) 🔥 Jala peño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@ Jalapeño: - this review has gone on for quite a long time - are you going to finish it or should someone else take it over? Thanks. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep in mind that this is work in progress, so please don't be surprised if it takes some time.
[1]:
Passed Sourcing seems adequate. (Roberts, pp. 425, 427-428)
[2]:
Passed
Source at the stated page (Roberts, p. 428) does not confirm any of the information in the article it's supposed to back up. (No infinity symbol and no propellor shaft) Apologies, the source is accurate. (Roberts, p. 428)
[3]:
Failed Source at the stated page isn't even in the France section, and contains no information about the submarine X. The stated page number may be a mistake. But the entire book has no mention of "Dauphin", "499,500" or "francs", either. I used the archive.org preview for this. (Campbell, p. 207)
[4]:
Passed
Source at the stated page (Garier, p. 200) does not confirm any of the information in the article it's supposed to back up. (No length, beam, or tonnage.) Apologies, the source is accurate. (Garier, p. 200)
[5]:
Passed Source backs up information in the article. (Roberts, p. 429)
[6]:
Passed} Source backs up information in the article. (Roberts, p. 428-429)
[7]:
Reviewing... Please be patient. (Garier, p. 202)
[8]: Not reviewed yet. (Roberts, p. 428)
[9]: ? Page 203 does not seem to be available in the Google Books previews. I will look for an alternate way to check the sourcing from this page. (Garier, p. 203)
None
Checking soon.
I'm missing lots of info. What did it do in the English Channel? Why did it make those two voyages mentioned in the article? When were those two voyages? Why weren't repairs made to the submarine?
Seems alright
Think that's all from me. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | French submarine X has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 27, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
French submarine X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of X (1904) from pl.wikipedia. |
![]() | A fact from French submarine X appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 December 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jalapeño ( talk · contribs) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this one. (Review version: 1177229354) 🔥 Jala peño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@ Jalapeño: - this review has gone on for quite a long time - are you going to finish it or should someone else take it over? Thanks. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep in mind that this is work in progress, so please don't be surprised if it takes some time.
[1]:
Passed Sourcing seems adequate. (Roberts, pp. 425, 427-428)
[2]:
Passed
Source at the stated page (Roberts, p. 428) does not confirm any of the information in the article it's supposed to back up. (No infinity symbol and no propellor shaft) Apologies, the source is accurate. (Roberts, p. 428)
[3]:
Failed Source at the stated page isn't even in the France section, and contains no information about the submarine X. The stated page number may be a mistake. But the entire book has no mention of "Dauphin", "499,500" or "francs", either. I used the archive.org preview for this. (Campbell, p. 207)
[4]:
Passed
Source at the stated page (Garier, p. 200) does not confirm any of the information in the article it's supposed to back up. (No length, beam, or tonnage.) Apologies, the source is accurate. (Garier, p. 200)
[5]:
Passed Source backs up information in the article. (Roberts, p. 429)
[6]:
Passed} Source backs up information in the article. (Roberts, p. 428-429)
[7]:
Reviewing... Please be patient. (Garier, p. 202)
[8]: Not reviewed yet. (Roberts, p. 428)
[9]: ? Page 203 does not seem to be available in the Google Books previews. I will look for an alternate way to check the sourcing from this page. (Garier, p. 203)
None
Checking soon.
I'm missing lots of info. What did it do in the English Channel? Why did it make those two voyages mentioned in the article? When were those two voyages? Why weren't repairs made to the submarine?
Seems alright
Think that's all from me. Parsecboy ( talk) 13:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)