French destroyer Fougueux has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 29, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
If the count used on the GAN page is correct, this will be my 400th GA review. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
For the required spot-checks: could you please give the relevant quote(s) from the source for the following statements in the article?
Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
French destroyer Fougueux has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 29, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
If the count used on the GAN page is correct, this will be my 400th GA review. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
For the required spot-checks: could you please give the relevant quote(s) from the source for the following statements in the article?
Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)