From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with Caparo T1

I vote for merging this with the T1 article. Though this car began life under the Freestream name, the car had barely been announced Business Week (February 7 2006) when Caparo took over Automotive World (March 15 2006). More info at Racecar (March 18 2006) So the Freestream article is never going to be more than a very short stub. Assuming things develop as planned, then a seperate article on Caparo Vehicle Technologies will be needed at some time soon but at this stage of the game I think the car and company history should be considered one and the same. Mighty Antar 22:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I vote against a merger. This has to do with a company, not the vehicle itself. I propose, however, that this article be renamed, or merged, with the Caparo Vehicle Technologies article. — Mr Grim Reaper ( talkcontribsemail), 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Since there are other companies called Freestream, and main use of the word is as an aeronautical engineering term, I renamed the page Freestream_(Cars). Paulgush ( talk) 20:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Only an Aeronautical Engineering term?

Wrong. It really is a Flow of fluids term. Anyway, the article on freestream is too short, incomplete and narrow that it is almost useless. Amclaussen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 ( talk) 19:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with Caparo T1

I vote for merging this with the T1 article. Though this car began life under the Freestream name, the car had barely been announced Business Week (February 7 2006) when Caparo took over Automotive World (March 15 2006). More info at Racecar (March 18 2006) So the Freestream article is never going to be more than a very short stub. Assuming things develop as planned, then a seperate article on Caparo Vehicle Technologies will be needed at some time soon but at this stage of the game I think the car and company history should be considered one and the same. Mighty Antar 22:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I vote against a merger. This has to do with a company, not the vehicle itself. I propose, however, that this article be renamed, or merged, with the Caparo Vehicle Technologies article. — Mr Grim Reaper ( talkcontribsemail), 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Since there are other companies called Freestream, and main use of the word is as an aeronautical engineering term, I renamed the page Freestream_(Cars). Paulgush ( talk) 20:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Only an Aeronautical Engineering term?

Wrong. It really is a Flow of fluids term. Anyway, the article on freestream is too short, incomplete and narrow that it is almost useless. Amclaussen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 ( talk) 19:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook