This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What makes this organization notable? Looking at the website, it consists of just 4 lodges, which makes me think that it has less than 100 members. WP:ORG lays out the criteria needed:
The Guideline goes on to discuss Non-commercial organizations:
In this case, I have to question whether such a small organization really qualifies as being a "national" in scale. Blueboar ( talk) 22:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I note that this article has been moved from Grand Lodge of Denmark to Freemasonry in Denmark, with the edit summary "Article is about Freemasonry in Denmark rather than a Grand Lodge". I have to question that. I do understand that the article is about more than one organization ... but it isn't about Freemasonry in Denmark either. It gives no background information, no history as to the development of Freemasonry in Denmark. It essentially remains a stub article about two masonic bodies that go by similar names. Neither of which is really notable.
The move strikes me as an attempt to avoid dealing with my questions as to the notability of the subject(s) of the original article, especially given that the notability tag was removed by the same editor who moved the article. The questions that I raised about what makes these organizations notable have not been answered. Blueboar ( talk) 01:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Rereading the original notability points you made the article was quite different. Then it was talking about the Storlogen af Danmark, the continental jurisdiction. It now talks about both jurisdictions and furthermore is about a far wider subject than this, Freemasonry in Denmark. So the notability argument will have to be remade. Is Freemasonry in Denmark a non notable subject? JASpencer ( talk) 08:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Since noone has objected I will remove the notability tag. -- Saddhiyama ( talk) 13:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What makes this organization notable? Looking at the website, it consists of just 4 lodges, which makes me think that it has less than 100 members. WP:ORG lays out the criteria needed:
The Guideline goes on to discuss Non-commercial organizations:
In this case, I have to question whether such a small organization really qualifies as being a "national" in scale. Blueboar ( talk) 22:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I note that this article has been moved from Grand Lodge of Denmark to Freemasonry in Denmark, with the edit summary "Article is about Freemasonry in Denmark rather than a Grand Lodge". I have to question that. I do understand that the article is about more than one organization ... but it isn't about Freemasonry in Denmark either. It gives no background information, no history as to the development of Freemasonry in Denmark. It essentially remains a stub article about two masonic bodies that go by similar names. Neither of which is really notable.
The move strikes me as an attempt to avoid dealing with my questions as to the notability of the subject(s) of the original article, especially given that the notability tag was removed by the same editor who moved the article. The questions that I raised about what makes these organizations notable have not been answered. Blueboar ( talk) 01:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Rereading the original notability points you made the article was quite different. Then it was talking about the Storlogen af Danmark, the continental jurisdiction. It now talks about both jurisdictions and furthermore is about a far wider subject than this, Freemasonry in Denmark. So the notability argument will have to be remade. Is Freemasonry in Denmark a non notable subject? JASpencer ( talk) 08:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Since noone has objected I will remove the notability tag. -- Saddhiyama ( talk) 13:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)