![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a January 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Sudan
Quintus314 ( talk) 10:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I urge all members to be on the lookout for OneGuy who has slapped a VFD on all discrimination articles against Islam. Kindly refute this effort by cross voting on all other discrimination pages
We need your votes so this can remain wikiepedia and not become Meccapedia-- Malbear 05:52, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
"From the website of the U.S. State Department" So not a neutral point of view then? Secretlondon
Why is this here? This is an encyclopedia, not the US web site. Moreover this material is highly biased by its very existance -- I can't find anything on the US web sites about the discrimination against Muslims in the US post-9/11, can you?
The reality of the Sudan is fairly straightforward. The Muslim-dominated northern areas have no natural resources, but do have all the shipping routes. The Christian and animist south sits on the oil, but has no access to shipping. Any Muslim/non-Muslim friction leads from this -- money, politics and a lack of any real education -- as it invariably does.
Let's get rid of this page, it's a waste of resources at best (it's already on the web), off topic in the middle, and insulting at worst. User:Maury Markowitz
And my complaint is that it is very hard to edit a large page written from one source. When it comes to external texts I think stubs are better. BL 10:37, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)
There is something wrong with the last section, I am afraid. The Mohamed Taha was executed 18 January 1985, during the Nimeiry period. /info/en/?search=Mahmoud_Mohammed_Taha Was that another Muhamed Taha? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titus Atomicus ( talk • contribs) 12:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Oh, there was two Mohameds Taha. I inserted the link.
The case is closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titus Atomicus ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
>The case is closed.
Not really. After some consideration I still do not understand the context.
What did that incident suppose to prove? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Titus Atomicus (
talk •
contribs)
14:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Sudan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a January 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Sudan
Quintus314 ( talk) 10:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I urge all members to be on the lookout for OneGuy who has slapped a VFD on all discrimination articles against Islam. Kindly refute this effort by cross voting on all other discrimination pages
We need your votes so this can remain wikiepedia and not become Meccapedia-- Malbear 05:52, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
"From the website of the U.S. State Department" So not a neutral point of view then? Secretlondon
Why is this here? This is an encyclopedia, not the US web site. Moreover this material is highly biased by its very existance -- I can't find anything on the US web sites about the discrimination against Muslims in the US post-9/11, can you?
The reality of the Sudan is fairly straightforward. The Muslim-dominated northern areas have no natural resources, but do have all the shipping routes. The Christian and animist south sits on the oil, but has no access to shipping. Any Muslim/non-Muslim friction leads from this -- money, politics and a lack of any real education -- as it invariably does.
Let's get rid of this page, it's a waste of resources at best (it's already on the web), off topic in the middle, and insulting at worst. User:Maury Markowitz
And my complaint is that it is very hard to edit a large page written from one source. When it comes to external texts I think stubs are better. BL 10:37, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)
There is something wrong with the last section, I am afraid. The Mohamed Taha was executed 18 January 1985, during the Nimeiry period. /info/en/?search=Mahmoud_Mohammed_Taha Was that another Muhamed Taha? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titus Atomicus ( talk • contribs) 12:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Oh, there was two Mohameds Taha. I inserted the link.
The case is closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titus Atomicus ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
>The case is closed.
Not really. After some consideration I still do not understand the context.
What did that incident suppose to prove? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Titus Atomicus (
talk •
contribs)
14:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Sudan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)