![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a January 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Malaysia
Some clown has put a total dispute on this page without disputing this page previously and slapped a VFD. I have removed it and urge others on this page to defend the knowledge space.
As the tag says "this page HAS been disputed". If you do not dispute it (and the talk page would be the logical forum for that) then bugger off until you do dispute it. We want to know
1) Which FACTS you dispute - and this doesn't just mean disagreeing with the source. 2) Which parts of the article you feel must be removed. 3) What else you think is wrong.
If you are not here to contribute and want to be a "censor" then i believe that the north korean domain for wikipedia is still open for registration.-- Malbear 05:45, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I find this article disturbing. Almost all of the text was copied down from the US government site. As if the US government's view is the one that should be featured here. Can someone please revise with NPOV? -- Aleen1412 05:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
"The Government generally restricts remarks or publications that might incite racial or religious disharmony. This includes some statements and publications critical of particular religions, especially Islam."
The government has not restricted any view critical of any religion except Islam. Please re-write -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"The Government also restricts the content of sermons at mosques. Some state governments ban certain Muslim clergymen from delivering sermons."
Already mentioned in previous para. -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"In family and religious matters, all Muslims are subject to Shari'a law. According to some women's rights activists, women are subject to discriminatory interpretations of Shari'a law and inconsistent application of the law from state to state."
If these women are muslim then....-- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"(the Government also grants limited funds to non-Islamic religious communities)"
Will remove this in 7 days from now if an example is not offered. Intuitively this cannot be true in Malaysia. -- Malbear 07:56, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"==State control of Religion== After the November 1999 national elections, the Government significantly expanded efforts to restrict the activities of the Islamic opposition party at mosques. Several states announced measures including banning opposition-affiliated imams from speaking at mosques, more vigorously enforcing existing restrictions on the content of sermons, replacing mosque leaders and governing committees thought to be sympathetic to the opposition, and threatening to close down unauthorized mosques with ties to the opposition. The Government justified such measures as necessary to oppose the "politicization of religion" by the opposition. Throughout 2001 government officials and ruling party politicians claimed that opposition Islamic party members were giving political sermons in mosques around the country."
"In June 2000, the Government announced that all Muslim civil servants must attend religious classes, but only Islamic classes are conducted. In addition, only teachers approved by the Government are employed."
"The Government continues to monitor the activities of the Shi'a minority, and the Government periodically detained members of what it considers Islamic "deviant sects" without trial or charge under the Internal Security Act (ISA) during the period covered by this report. "
"In November 2000, the Shari’a High Court in the state of Kelantan, which is controlled by the Islamic opposition party, sentenced four persons to 3 years in prison for disregarding a lower court order to recant their alleged heretical beliefs and "return to the true teachings of Islam." The High Court rejected their argument that Shari’a law has no jurisdiction over them because they had ceased to be Muslims."
Again this article is not about how muslims treat other muslims. -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The last two sections at the end are factually accurate, and there seems to be no remarkable ommission or twisting of facts. However, the wording reads to me like an editorial opposing these practices. I guess some work could be done on making them more encyclopedic. Johnleemk | Talk 06:54, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Do we need to include the incident where the PAS Youth lodged a police report against Astora Jabat? Clearly it was merely a report but no action was taken against Astora Jabat. Furthermore, that case looked more like a libel case rather than a discriminatory move.
__earth 19:46, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
In 2004 the Bar Council of Malaysia journal "Infoline" carried an article which questioned the need for the Azan as it was disturing to non-Muslims and not needful. The article was condemmed.
Condemned by whom? please complete the sentence. __earth 00:49, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)
As for Aslina it is an on going case right now. Also there is the case of the indian converting and then taking his children (against the rule of the family court may I add). However I need to get the facts right before writing so it has not been done. Am thinking to pick up the law journals this week but my schedule is a bit tight since I do have a day job and this is "for fun". Additionally before Aslina there were notable cases of Citibank Aishah (she was imprisoned by her own family), there waa joshua jamaluddin (who was imprisoned and tortured) and nur himli (cannot remember spelling, who was hounded out of his job bythe authorities). Also there is the case of some old dude (cannot remember name so have to dig up) who had to move from his village and eventually had to give up his race on his IC. Yes each is a small thread and taken alone it doesn't amount to much but all these threads together form a picture. -- Malbear 08:27, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This never happened to the Wisma Tiong Hua in Johor Bahru, according to the reports from the Chinese. I removed that unfair sentence stating this. User:Chan Han Xiang
From Dictionary.com
Discrimination [2]
Right now most of the content is just a big lump of religion-related issues in Malaysia. I'd be cutting down the content and sticking with what the current title says. Any objections? -- Andylkl 07:49, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
Anyone who wish to carried out further discussion should read the definition about Humantarianism. It doesn't care about the country you are from and what value your culture held. If the culture permit the act of against humanity, it should not afraid of being document in wikipedia!
Do take note that the current Malaysia constitution are not the same version to independent.
In addition, there is little touch and research on the native "Orang Asli" religious rights. Unlike the native in East Malaysia, Native in West Malaysia are involuntery converted.
-- sltan
Greetings,
I have a letter in my possesion, scanned here, from a Malaysian university. I am unable to find any English sources from the govt websites of malaysia that supports one way or the other the malaysian law against Shias that the letter talks about.
I think this is not a federal policy, but rather a state policy. But I cannot verify it.
Can anybody help verifying this?-- Zereshk 01:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Who has some verifiable information about the Malaysian attitude to Judaism? I know from experience that it is not well covered in schools, that malaysian passports are stamped 'valid in all countries apart from Israel' and that the TV stations tend to favour Palestinian footage over Israli suffering.
Up to 1000 protesters chanted slogans such as "Jika Azhar datang, kita bakarkan gereja ini sampai jadi abu!" (when translated, it says: If Azhar comes, we will burn this church down to ashes).
Where did u ppl get this? we need a citation pls and stop fired-up the religion discrimination,theres no such thing in malaysia, come to malaysia if u want to know, see it for ur self.
Well should we take a high prist in Malaysia as citation for the discrimination, since its all pointed over the christian.
btw, in msia we respect all religion (include bahai and judaism) but we do not insult our religion by equalize our religion with other religion, but its different with apostace(watever), they are still under shariah court juridiction, plus this apostace can go convert over the border as in singapura, they dont have to fight in msia, since msia is a Islamic nation. -- tearfate 09:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Malaysia is a full racist country which discriminates religions as well as there own citizens, if you fill out a form you will have to tell whether you are Bumiputra, Indian or Chinese. If you are a Bumiputra then you are lucky because you get alot discount in property. Being a Muslim is not so huge in Malaysia but being a Bumiputra is like they are trying to be the Royal Saudi families. I am a foreigner Shia Muslim in Malaysia I asked many Imams of what they think about the Shia's, I didnt tell them I was Shia otherwise I would have been sitting in Jail, all the informations that the Imam's gave were roumers none of them true. For Muslims they are like this then I dont know what they will be for others.
vnethussain
While I can understand the emotions that issues like this can bring about, I don't think writing this article the way it is written does any justice to Wikipedia. Let's stick to the facts, folks and keep the personal opinions out of the articles. If its a cited opinion within context of the article, then make sure the citation is provided but keep in mind the article needs to be neutral.
I think its high time this whole article is rewritten, not as a whitewash, but to remove some of the more anti-Muslim bias tone from it. - Bob K 17:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The article suggests a non Muslim cannot marry a Muslim in Malaysia. Definitely many Google results and also anecdotal evidence I heard from one party involved in such a situation this is true. However also from Google re Malaysia and also from memory of a Catholic news paper in Malaysia and I think other sources it's suggested a Christian female can in fact marry a Muslim male although she obviously can't teach her children her religion. In general terms this is mentioned Interreligious marriage. Is anyone aware of any case or evidence to suggest it is in fact practiced in Malaysia and is not simply theoretical 'should be allowed' but has never actually been done? I suspect there would be strong pressure on the female to convert in any case and by not converting your likely to have even bigger problems in the event of divorce & custody disputed but it would be good to add details on this if any are available both on the theoretical side as supported by Malaysian sources and on the practical side Nil Einne 19:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I have some concerns about the letter. Given the way it's presented and the fact it appears it hasn't been referred to in a reliable source I feel it's a bit ORy. Do others agree? Nil Einne 19:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
This article is discussing not just Religious freedom in Malaysia, but Religion in Malaysia in general. Yet, there is a different article for that subject Religion in Malaysia. Bless sins ( talk) 16:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
This article is sparsely sourced and seems to contain a lot of editorializing. I intend to re-write when possible and delete when not. Monkeyassault ( talk) 05:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
This article has been revised as part of
a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See
the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or
plagiarize from that source. Please see our
guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --
Mkativerata (
talk) 20:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.gatago.com/talk/politics/mideast/12428067.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/1/11/nation/5447587&sec=nationWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 16 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F24%2Fnation%2F20070924191019&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F19%2Fcourts%2F18927515&sec=courts{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=284781&Itemid=77{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F5%2F30%2Fnation%2F20070530115251&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2008%2F8%2F18%2Fnation%2F20080818192650&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2005%2F9%2F28%2Fparliament%2F12168612&sec=parliamentWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Azmi Mohamad Azam v Director of Jabatan Agama Islam Sarawak and Others in the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak [3]---- Bancki ( talk) 11:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
The article says that Judaism is not a recognized religion in Malaysia. Where is the source for this claim? Seethruskinnnn ( talk) 21:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a January 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Discrimination against non-Muslims in Malaysia
Some clown has put a total dispute on this page without disputing this page previously and slapped a VFD. I have removed it and urge others on this page to defend the knowledge space.
As the tag says "this page HAS been disputed". If you do not dispute it (and the talk page would be the logical forum for that) then bugger off until you do dispute it. We want to know
1) Which FACTS you dispute - and this doesn't just mean disagreeing with the source. 2) Which parts of the article you feel must be removed. 3) What else you think is wrong.
If you are not here to contribute and want to be a "censor" then i believe that the north korean domain for wikipedia is still open for registration.-- Malbear 05:45, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I find this article disturbing. Almost all of the text was copied down from the US government site. As if the US government's view is the one that should be featured here. Can someone please revise with NPOV? -- Aleen1412 05:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
"The Government generally restricts remarks or publications that might incite racial or religious disharmony. This includes some statements and publications critical of particular religions, especially Islam."
The government has not restricted any view critical of any religion except Islam. Please re-write -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"The Government also restricts the content of sermons at mosques. Some state governments ban certain Muslim clergymen from delivering sermons."
Already mentioned in previous para. -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"In family and religious matters, all Muslims are subject to Shari'a law. According to some women's rights activists, women are subject to discriminatory interpretations of Shari'a law and inconsistent application of the law from state to state."
If these women are muslim then....-- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"(the Government also grants limited funds to non-Islamic religious communities)"
Will remove this in 7 days from now if an example is not offered. Intuitively this cannot be true in Malaysia. -- Malbear 07:56, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"==State control of Religion== After the November 1999 national elections, the Government significantly expanded efforts to restrict the activities of the Islamic opposition party at mosques. Several states announced measures including banning opposition-affiliated imams from speaking at mosques, more vigorously enforcing existing restrictions on the content of sermons, replacing mosque leaders and governing committees thought to be sympathetic to the opposition, and threatening to close down unauthorized mosques with ties to the opposition. The Government justified such measures as necessary to oppose the "politicization of religion" by the opposition. Throughout 2001 government officials and ruling party politicians claimed that opposition Islamic party members were giving political sermons in mosques around the country."
"In June 2000, the Government announced that all Muslim civil servants must attend religious classes, but only Islamic classes are conducted. In addition, only teachers approved by the Government are employed."
"The Government continues to monitor the activities of the Shi'a minority, and the Government periodically detained members of what it considers Islamic "deviant sects" without trial or charge under the Internal Security Act (ISA) during the period covered by this report. "
"In November 2000, the Shari’a High Court in the state of Kelantan, which is controlled by the Islamic opposition party, sentenced four persons to 3 years in prison for disregarding a lower court order to recant their alleged heretical beliefs and "return to the true teachings of Islam." The High Court rejected their argument that Shari’a law has no jurisdiction over them because they had ceased to be Muslims."
Again this article is not about how muslims treat other muslims. -- Malbear 09:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The last two sections at the end are factually accurate, and there seems to be no remarkable ommission or twisting of facts. However, the wording reads to me like an editorial opposing these practices. I guess some work could be done on making them more encyclopedic. Johnleemk | Talk 06:54, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Do we need to include the incident where the PAS Youth lodged a police report against Astora Jabat? Clearly it was merely a report but no action was taken against Astora Jabat. Furthermore, that case looked more like a libel case rather than a discriminatory move.
__earth 19:46, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
In 2004 the Bar Council of Malaysia journal "Infoline" carried an article which questioned the need for the Azan as it was disturing to non-Muslims and not needful. The article was condemmed.
Condemned by whom? please complete the sentence. __earth 00:49, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)
As for Aslina it is an on going case right now. Also there is the case of the indian converting and then taking his children (against the rule of the family court may I add). However I need to get the facts right before writing so it has not been done. Am thinking to pick up the law journals this week but my schedule is a bit tight since I do have a day job and this is "for fun". Additionally before Aslina there were notable cases of Citibank Aishah (she was imprisoned by her own family), there waa joshua jamaluddin (who was imprisoned and tortured) and nur himli (cannot remember spelling, who was hounded out of his job bythe authorities). Also there is the case of some old dude (cannot remember name so have to dig up) who had to move from his village and eventually had to give up his race on his IC. Yes each is a small thread and taken alone it doesn't amount to much but all these threads together form a picture. -- Malbear 08:27, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This never happened to the Wisma Tiong Hua in Johor Bahru, according to the reports from the Chinese. I removed that unfair sentence stating this. User:Chan Han Xiang
From Dictionary.com
Discrimination [2]
Right now most of the content is just a big lump of religion-related issues in Malaysia. I'd be cutting down the content and sticking with what the current title says. Any objections? -- Andylkl 07:49, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
Anyone who wish to carried out further discussion should read the definition about Humantarianism. It doesn't care about the country you are from and what value your culture held. If the culture permit the act of against humanity, it should not afraid of being document in wikipedia!
Do take note that the current Malaysia constitution are not the same version to independent.
In addition, there is little touch and research on the native "Orang Asli" religious rights. Unlike the native in East Malaysia, Native in West Malaysia are involuntery converted.
-- sltan
Greetings,
I have a letter in my possesion, scanned here, from a Malaysian university. I am unable to find any English sources from the govt websites of malaysia that supports one way or the other the malaysian law against Shias that the letter talks about.
I think this is not a federal policy, but rather a state policy. But I cannot verify it.
Can anybody help verifying this?-- Zereshk 01:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Who has some verifiable information about the Malaysian attitude to Judaism? I know from experience that it is not well covered in schools, that malaysian passports are stamped 'valid in all countries apart from Israel' and that the TV stations tend to favour Palestinian footage over Israli suffering.
Up to 1000 protesters chanted slogans such as "Jika Azhar datang, kita bakarkan gereja ini sampai jadi abu!" (when translated, it says: If Azhar comes, we will burn this church down to ashes).
Where did u ppl get this? we need a citation pls and stop fired-up the religion discrimination,theres no such thing in malaysia, come to malaysia if u want to know, see it for ur self.
Well should we take a high prist in Malaysia as citation for the discrimination, since its all pointed over the christian.
btw, in msia we respect all religion (include bahai and judaism) but we do not insult our religion by equalize our religion with other religion, but its different with apostace(watever), they are still under shariah court juridiction, plus this apostace can go convert over the border as in singapura, they dont have to fight in msia, since msia is a Islamic nation. -- tearfate 09:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Malaysia is a full racist country which discriminates religions as well as there own citizens, if you fill out a form you will have to tell whether you are Bumiputra, Indian or Chinese. If you are a Bumiputra then you are lucky because you get alot discount in property. Being a Muslim is not so huge in Malaysia but being a Bumiputra is like they are trying to be the Royal Saudi families. I am a foreigner Shia Muslim in Malaysia I asked many Imams of what they think about the Shia's, I didnt tell them I was Shia otherwise I would have been sitting in Jail, all the informations that the Imam's gave were roumers none of them true. For Muslims they are like this then I dont know what they will be for others.
vnethussain
While I can understand the emotions that issues like this can bring about, I don't think writing this article the way it is written does any justice to Wikipedia. Let's stick to the facts, folks and keep the personal opinions out of the articles. If its a cited opinion within context of the article, then make sure the citation is provided but keep in mind the article needs to be neutral.
I think its high time this whole article is rewritten, not as a whitewash, but to remove some of the more anti-Muslim bias tone from it. - Bob K 17:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The article suggests a non Muslim cannot marry a Muslim in Malaysia. Definitely many Google results and also anecdotal evidence I heard from one party involved in such a situation this is true. However also from Google re Malaysia and also from memory of a Catholic news paper in Malaysia and I think other sources it's suggested a Christian female can in fact marry a Muslim male although she obviously can't teach her children her religion. In general terms this is mentioned Interreligious marriage. Is anyone aware of any case or evidence to suggest it is in fact practiced in Malaysia and is not simply theoretical 'should be allowed' but has never actually been done? I suspect there would be strong pressure on the female to convert in any case and by not converting your likely to have even bigger problems in the event of divorce & custody disputed but it would be good to add details on this if any are available both on the theoretical side as supported by Malaysian sources and on the practical side Nil Einne 19:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I have some concerns about the letter. Given the way it's presented and the fact it appears it hasn't been referred to in a reliable source I feel it's a bit ORy. Do others agree? Nil Einne 19:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
This article is discussing not just Religious freedom in Malaysia, but Religion in Malaysia in general. Yet, there is a different article for that subject Religion in Malaysia. Bless sins ( talk) 16:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
This article is sparsely sourced and seems to contain a lot of editorializing. I intend to re-write when possible and delete when not. Monkeyassault ( talk) 05:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
This article has been revised as part of
a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See
the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or
plagiarize from that source. Please see our
guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --
Mkativerata (
talk) 20:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.gatago.com/talk/politics/mideast/12428067.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/1/11/nation/5447587&sec=nationWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 16 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F24%2Fnation%2F20070924191019&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F9%2F19%2Fcourts%2F18927515&sec=courts{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=284781&Itemid=77{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2007%2F5%2F30%2Fnation%2F20070530115251&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2008%2F8%2F18%2Fnation%2F20080818192650&sec=nation{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2005%2F9%2F28%2Fparliament%2F12168612&sec=parliamentWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Freedom of religion in Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Azmi Mohamad Azam v Director of Jabatan Agama Islam Sarawak and Others in the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak [3]---- Bancki ( talk) 11:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
The article says that Judaism is not a recognized religion in Malaysia. Where is the source for this claim? Seethruskinnnn ( talk) 21:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)