This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a question to somebody with competence: is the VFs (official) goal still the creation of a volkstaat, in other words a secession from south africa? -- Severino ( talk) 10:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
@leuce: afrikaners constitute about 6% of the population of ZA. the VF got less than 1% in the last elections. so it's clear the bulk of them didn't vote the VF. it's pretty clear that most of them voted for the DA. but as elections are secret, we have no evidence, right. when i find reports about polls or analysis, i'll insert it.-- Severino ( talk) 17:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Would it be worth reporting that the Afrikaner enclave of Orania voted decisively for the Freedom Front Plus (according to the Orania Wikipedia Page)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Invmog ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I've read through this page a few times, so far. Am I reading this correctly? Is the FF+ a Racialism political movement/party? If so, doesn't that need to be made clear on the page? On top of that, the party sounds like it's either explicity seperatist, or at the very least implied. Honestly, if this page is to be accurate, it needs to be written more carefully and more clearly, because it's currently being written as if this is just like any other political party in the South African political spectrum when it seems to me that it's clearly quite a fundamentalist, racialist (probably even racist) group that holds some pretty extreme views by just about any world standard. -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 03:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom Front Plus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The VF+ has publicly announced its support for Cape independence, therefore, the "Ideology" tab should include Cape Secession. CapingThroughTheBlue ( talk) 15:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Can the VF+ still be described as supporting the creation of a Volkstaat? It's no longer part of their campaigning, and features nowhere on their website. Volkstaat support is no longer part of any serious political discourse. The Party supports larger self-determination and autonomy for all South Africans, should the 'Volkstaat' ideology thus be replaced with 'Self-determination'? CapingThroughTheBlue ( talk) 09:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a question to somebody with competence: is the VFs (official) goal still the creation of a volkstaat, in other words a secession from south africa? -- Severino ( talk) 10:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
@leuce: afrikaners constitute about 6% of the population of ZA. the VF got less than 1% in the last elections. so it's clear the bulk of them didn't vote the VF. it's pretty clear that most of them voted for the DA. but as elections are secret, we have no evidence, right. when i find reports about polls or analysis, i'll insert it.-- Severino ( talk) 17:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Would it be worth reporting that the Afrikaner enclave of Orania voted decisively for the Freedom Front Plus (according to the Orania Wikipedia Page)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Invmog ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I've read through this page a few times, so far. Am I reading this correctly? Is the FF+ a Racialism political movement/party? If so, doesn't that need to be made clear on the page? On top of that, the party sounds like it's either explicity seperatist, or at the very least implied. Honestly, if this page is to be accurate, it needs to be written more carefully and more clearly, because it's currently being written as if this is just like any other political party in the South African political spectrum when it seems to me that it's clearly quite a fundamentalist, racialist (probably even racist) group that holds some pretty extreme views by just about any world standard. -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 03:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom Front Plus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The VF+ has publicly announced its support for Cape independence, therefore, the "Ideology" tab should include Cape Secession. CapingThroughTheBlue ( talk) 15:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Can the VF+ still be described as supporting the creation of a Volkstaat? It's no longer part of their campaigning, and features nowhere on their website. Volkstaat support is no longer part of any serious political discourse. The Party supports larger self-determination and autonomy for all South Africans, should the 'Volkstaat' ideology thus be replaced with 'Self-determination'? CapingThroughTheBlue ( talk) 09:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)