This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm thinking about doing some work on this article - it's not my area of expertise but it seems to need some help. Others have thoughts? - Sara FB ( talk) 22:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Not that we really should take editorial direction from what other people do with our work, I noticed that when you ask Google Voice "what are free licenses" or "what is a free license", it starts reading out the article at "Most free licenses are...".This makes what is being read out very criptic. Maybe whe should try to adjust the text so that people rely on this service get a better result? People with accessibility issues might not manage to get anything but this out of the article. 1Veertje ( talk) 14:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
I think BSD license allows open source software to be redistributed as closed source which should not happen by 4 freedom. Are you sure that BSD license is a free license ? it's a free-software license but is it also free license ? 85.185.57.194 ( talk) 13:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Free license → Open license – Most used open license Creative Commons prefer the term 'open license'. [1] [2] The term is more neutral and correct. Even in the text, the term open has been quite dominant. In the past, both were used very crosswise, but I unified it and we agreed that. Why not rename the article? :) -- Avoinlähde ( talk) 13:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 20:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. signed, 511KeV (talk) 07:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Would a decision be made on this? It seems that most are not interested or at least not opposed. I would think, both go to the majority of Wikipedists. I add one more source: https://opendefinition.org -- Avoinlähde ( talk) 17:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
References
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm thinking about doing some work on this article - it's not my area of expertise but it seems to need some help. Others have thoughts? - Sara FB ( talk) 22:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Not that we really should take editorial direction from what other people do with our work, I noticed that when you ask Google Voice "what are free licenses" or "what is a free license", it starts reading out the article at "Most free licenses are...".This makes what is being read out very criptic. Maybe whe should try to adjust the text so that people rely on this service get a better result? People with accessibility issues might not manage to get anything but this out of the article. 1Veertje ( talk) 14:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
I think BSD license allows open source software to be redistributed as closed source which should not happen by 4 freedom. Are you sure that BSD license is a free license ? it's a free-software license but is it also free license ? 85.185.57.194 ( talk) 13:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Free license → Open license – Most used open license Creative Commons prefer the term 'open license'. [1] [2] The term is more neutral and correct. Even in the text, the term open has been quite dominant. In the past, both were used very crosswise, but I unified it and we agreed that. Why not rename the article? :) -- Avoinlähde ( talk) 13:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 20:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. signed, 511KeV (talk) 07:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Would a decision be made on this? It seems that most are not interested or at least not opposed. I would think, both go to the majority of Wikipedists. I add one more source: https://opendefinition.org -- Avoinlähde ( talk) 17:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
References