This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to the FCC action against the station are both from left wing sources. No objectivity is presumed. The phrase "federal marshals armed with assault rifles" is a description used for dramatic effect. The link to the station's web site is sufficient. The assertion the station returned to broadcasting "with a strong showing of community support" is unsubstantiated. The article will be edited in view of these issues. 184.100.94.240 ( talk) 17:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The sourcing looks ok to me (see also the ANI thread). I have reverted 184.100.94.240's aggressive edits. 184.100.94.240 has already reverted twice and should be on notice of the 3-revert rule which can lead to a block on a 4th revert. The edit warring here is obvious enough to justify blocking on 3rd revert in my opinion. 66.127.55.52 ( talk) 06:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to the FCC action against the station are both from left wing sources. No objectivity is presumed. The phrase "federal marshals armed with assault rifles" is a description used for dramatic effect. The link to the station's web site is sufficient. The assertion the station returned to broadcasting "with a strong showing of community support" is unsubstantiated. The article will be edited in view of these issues. 184.100.94.240 ( talk) 17:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The sourcing looks ok to me (see also the ANI thread). I have reverted 184.100.94.240's aggressive edits. 184.100.94.240 has already reverted twice and should be on notice of the 3-revert rule which can lead to a block on a 4th revert. The edit warring here is obvious enough to justify blocking on 3rd revert in my opinion. 66.127.55.52 ( talk) 06:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)