This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fredrik Reinfeldt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 400 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fredrik Reinfeldt was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is notable, is it? Or it particularly foreshadows his future or indicates his character? I think not. Just because something can be sourced doesn't mean it ought to be included. If you were to ask me, we need less of that kind of thing in the article, not more. Harfarhs ( talk) 19:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
URLs for review
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Fredrik Reinfeldt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at |
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure we should have a criticism section in this page. Every public figure is subject to criticism, but unless it is extremely wounding (for example corruption allegations), it is not on the page of the public figure. For instance, neither Trump nor Obama have criticism sections on their pages. It also seems like, even if a criticism section would be good, the current one doesn't have much merit. It uses very ideological words ("Sell out" and such) and instead just lists off articles in newspapers that dislike Reinfeldt with what they are criticizing him of. This would be strange to do for any public figure and doesn't really add anything to the article. I can assume Reinfeldt has critics.
All politicians should have a criticism section. Fredrik Reinfeldt and other politicians are psychopaths and their psychopathy should be pointed out. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.44.225.249 (
talk)
14:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
It definitely would need some rewriting, for example it might be relevant that his quote about barbarism (the meaning of which btw is somewhat altered in translation) is paraphrasing a speech by Esaias Tegner. I am also not sure whether ProjektSanning is a relevant source for criticism of Reinfeldt considering it is little more than a far-right blog KnightofFaerië ( talk) 16:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)-
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fredrik Reinfeldt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 400 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fredrik Reinfeldt was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is notable, is it? Or it particularly foreshadows his future or indicates his character? I think not. Just because something can be sourced doesn't mean it ought to be included. If you were to ask me, we need less of that kind of thing in the article, not more. Harfarhs ( talk) 19:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
URLs for review
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Fredrik Reinfeldt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at |
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure we should have a criticism section in this page. Every public figure is subject to criticism, but unless it is extremely wounding (for example corruption allegations), it is not on the page of the public figure. For instance, neither Trump nor Obama have criticism sections on their pages. It also seems like, even if a criticism section would be good, the current one doesn't have much merit. It uses very ideological words ("Sell out" and such) and instead just lists off articles in newspapers that dislike Reinfeldt with what they are criticizing him of. This would be strange to do for any public figure and doesn't really add anything to the article. I can assume Reinfeldt has critics.
All politicians should have a criticism section. Fredrik Reinfeldt and other politicians are psychopaths and their psychopathy should be pointed out. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.44.225.249 (
talk)
14:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
It definitely would need some rewriting, for example it might be relevant that his quote about barbarism (the meaning of which btw is somewhat altered in translation) is paraphrasing a speech by Esaias Tegner. I am also not sure whether ProjektSanning is a relevant source for criticism of Reinfeldt considering it is little more than a far-right blog KnightofFaerië ( talk) 16:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)-