Frederik Magle has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 2, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Frederik Magle appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 September 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Is this still a stub? Granted, there's obviously room for expansion but it doesn't seems "stub-like" to me. I'd like to hear other opinions before removing the stub tags. Thanks ( Danmuz ( talk) 11:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)).
Is it worth mentioning that Magle funds and maintains one of the largest (if not the largest) classical music discussion forums on the Internet? It's Talk Classical ( http://www.talkclassical.com). Opus131 ( talk) 07:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden ( talk · contribs) 01:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Right. This article looks pretty good at first glance; let's start with the few things that'll need dealt with:
First of all, there are a few bits which, while likely sourced or easily sourced, technically are not. I'll mark the smaller cases with citation needed tags, but, while I suppose we can take the recordings as self-citing - there's sufficient information about each of them, I'd like to see sources for the list of works, and clarification as to whether it's a complete list (to a specific date), or a selected list.
As for sources - well, I don't read Danish very well, so, I'm going to assume good faith to some extent, but I will ask: Can you please review the sources, and assure me that they may all be considered reliable sources?
We can move on from there once that's done. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 01:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Right then! I've given it a careful read through, and I think this is an excellent article. A little more work, and I wouldn't be surprised to see this as a Featured Article. Its prose is generally very good, but it could use a copyeditor before FAC, just to smooth out the occasional minor point: It's perfectly readable, and usually perfectly grammatical, but the occasional sentence can be a little unpolished. The worst I noticed was: The cantata's text is by the author Iben Krogsdal; based on the story of Saint Cecilia, who died in a gruesome way for her Christian faith, it has been described as "moderate modernism" with a special "Danish tone" and a transparent chamber musical instrumentation. - and you know, that's perfectly comprehensible, it's just kind of odd, with the off-hand mention of her gruesome death, and it has the only grammatical errors I've noticed: the semicolon should be a comma, and it needs a full stop or semicolon after "faith".
But please don't get me wrong. The text is very well-written on the whole, it just needs a little polish to get to FA-quality.
The only other suggestion I'd give is to consider fair using one or two short samples of his music. The Infinite Second has a particularly interesting description, and might be a good choice to show some of the extremes of his style, so long as a sample can fairly represent it.
In any case, excellent work. Pass. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 23:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Frederik Magle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frederik Magle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Frederik Magle has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 2, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Frederik Magle appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 September 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Is this still a stub? Granted, there's obviously room for expansion but it doesn't seems "stub-like" to me. I'd like to hear other opinions before removing the stub tags. Thanks ( Danmuz ( talk) 11:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)).
Is it worth mentioning that Magle funds and maintains one of the largest (if not the largest) classical music discussion forums on the Internet? It's Talk Classical ( http://www.talkclassical.com). Opus131 ( talk) 07:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden ( talk · contribs) 01:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Right. This article looks pretty good at first glance; let's start with the few things that'll need dealt with:
First of all, there are a few bits which, while likely sourced or easily sourced, technically are not. I'll mark the smaller cases with citation needed tags, but, while I suppose we can take the recordings as self-citing - there's sufficient information about each of them, I'd like to see sources for the list of works, and clarification as to whether it's a complete list (to a specific date), or a selected list.
As for sources - well, I don't read Danish very well, so, I'm going to assume good faith to some extent, but I will ask: Can you please review the sources, and assure me that they may all be considered reliable sources?
We can move on from there once that's done. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 01:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Right then! I've given it a careful read through, and I think this is an excellent article. A little more work, and I wouldn't be surprised to see this as a Featured Article. Its prose is generally very good, but it could use a copyeditor before FAC, just to smooth out the occasional minor point: It's perfectly readable, and usually perfectly grammatical, but the occasional sentence can be a little unpolished. The worst I noticed was: The cantata's text is by the author Iben Krogsdal; based on the story of Saint Cecilia, who died in a gruesome way for her Christian faith, it has been described as "moderate modernism" with a special "Danish tone" and a transparent chamber musical instrumentation. - and you know, that's perfectly comprehensible, it's just kind of odd, with the off-hand mention of her gruesome death, and it has the only grammatical errors I've noticed: the semicolon should be a comma, and it needs a full stop or semicolon after "faith".
But please don't get me wrong. The text is very well-written on the whole, it just needs a little polish to get to FA-quality.
The only other suggestion I'd give is to consider fair using one or two short samples of his music. The Infinite Second has a particularly interesting description, and might be a good choice to show some of the extremes of his style, so long as a sample can fairly represent it.
In any case, excellent work. Pass. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 23:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Frederik Magle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frederik Magle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)