This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Hi, imho Category:Photography in India is a very 'bad' choice, imho usually photographers are categorized by country of origin, p.e. Category:German photographers accordingly to this wiki. Regards, Roland zh 18:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Checked version history: @ User:Cpt.a.haddock ref. your revert 09:35, 24 August 2014‎, please see above, Roland zh 18:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks. But how else can we categorise photographers who are not Indian but are known for photographs of India? Category:Photography in India appears to be a reasonable compromise. If you check the category, you can see that Linnaeus Tripe, Bourne & Shepherd et al. have all been categorised so. FWIW, I don't think that I'm too enamoured with the current system.