![]() | Frederica Planta has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 19, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Frederica Planta appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 December 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
03:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Created by Kusma ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 13:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
The only image is appropriately licenced; Earwig finds no issues. Sources are reliable.
That's the only question I have. Spotchecks (footnote numbers refer to this version):
-- Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 14:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Frederica Planta has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 19, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Frederica Planta appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 December 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
03:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Created by Kusma ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 13:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 13:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
The only image is appropriately licenced; Earwig finds no issues. Sources are reliable.
That's the only question I have. Spotchecks (footnote numbers refer to this version):
-- Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 14:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)