![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | Material from Frank Russell Company was split to Russell Investments on 2020-03-08. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Image:Russelllogo.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
This entry reads like a corporate sales brochure and is therefore likely written by the company that is the subject of the article. If this is true, the objectiveness of the information comes into question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.154.6 ( talk) 09:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Now that Russell has been split into LSEG Russell (Russell Indexes) and the investment division retains the name Russell Investments under new owner TA Associates, both this page and the Russell Indexes page need updating. That's best done by a third-party who is not affiliated with Russell.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.132.94.7 ( talk) 23:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
The current Russell Investments page has a number of factual inaccuracies and unverified claims. The page has been identified as requiring cleanup and additional citations. I am requesting help from an approved editor to review the page and adjust inaccuracies. Specifically - the following:
Done I re-wrote it substantially so that it was more concise and had a different tone. We don't need to list every service individually. If I introduced an error, please let me know.
CorporateM (
Talk)
22:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The list of global offices is missing several locations, namely:
Amsterdam, Beijing, Chicago, San Diego, Milwaukee, Edinburgh [8]
Kosterberg ( talk) 22:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
COI request for edits to company ownership information
Northwestern Mutual is no longer the parent company of Russell Investments. The London Stock Exchange Group completed its acquisition of Russell on December 3, 2014.
Press release issued by LSEG is available here: [1]
Kosterberg ( talk) 18:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
COI request for edits to the company ownership information
The London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) is no longer the parent company of Russell Investments.
LSEG sold Russell Investments to private equity firms TA Associates and Reverence Capital Partners. The acquisition was completed on Jun 1, 2016
The press release issued by TA Associates is available here: [2]
Kosterberg ( talk) 15:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)kosterberg
This wiki article was written in a terrible form. The former Russell group, was headed by Frank Russell Company instead of Russell Investments. London Stock Exchange Group acquired Frank Russell Company instead of Russell Investments in 2014. And then LSEG sold the second-tier subsidiary Russell Investments instead of Frank Russell Company. Based on the timeline and content, most of the content was about Frank Russell Company. However, it seem more appropriate to split the article into Frank Russell Company and Russell Investments. The former covered the combined business and the latter covered the current Russell group. The index provider business of Russell , the current content should be placed in FTSE Russell, however. Matthew hk ( talk) 21:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello! On behalf of Russell Investments via Edelman, and as part of my work with Beutler Ink, I've been working to draft a standalone Wikipedia article specific to Russell Investments. I agree with User:Matthew hk's assessment entirely – the current Frank Russell Company article is a mess, and there should be separate pages for Frank Russell Company and Russell Investments. I've saved a draft article for review here: User:Inkian Jason/Russell Investments.
Given my conflict of interest, I will not publish the article to the main space and ask independent reviewers to check the draft for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. I've used only Wikipedia-appropriate sourcing, and Russell Investments has provided feedback during this process to ensure the article's accuracy. I don't think any of the content is particularly controversial, but I'd be more than happy to address any questions or concerns that may arise during the review process.
As for the Frank Russell Company page, I think the Russell Investments infobox should be removed, and the content should be trimmed down to a stub. The current content is highly problematic (unsourced or poorly sourced, poorly written, etc.); cutting down the text would also allow removal of the other tags. I'm certainly open to others' ideas for addressing the Frank Russell Company article, but cleaning the slate would at least address the tags and set the page up for expansion.
@ Matthew hk: Given your familiarity with these companies, and since you proposed the split back in March 2019, I'm hoping you might be willing to review the draft and copy the markup over to Russell Investments (which is currently a redirect page). I think you'll find this is a solid first step at splitting, and I'd be happy to add a similar COI template to Talk:Russell Investments if a separate page is created. Again, my primary goals here are to create a standalone page for Russell Investments, as you've proposed, and to trim down this page to an appropriate stub in an effort to avoid confusion and encourage future expansion.
Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason ( talk) 17:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Inkian Jason left a note on my Talk page about this open request. I've looked at his proposed draft and consider it to be superior to the current article. As this has been open for more than a week now without objections, I'm going to implement it at EOW assuming no final objections are raised here. Chetsford ( talk) 23:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Russell Investments →
Frank Russell Company – As the step 1 of the proposed split (see above thread). This article was mostly about "Frank Russell Company", the central company of the former Russell group, not the subsidiary Russell Investments. Thus the article title should reflect this first to retain the purpose of this wiki article as an article for a company/group before 2015 split. LSEG only sold Russell Investments the second-tier subsidiary, not the subsidiary Frank Russell Company and all its subsidiaries. (see
press release: "Frank Russell Company's asset management business ('Russell Investments')") The index provider "Russell" was "merged" or now sharing a trading name
FTSE Russell with
FTSE Group, thus future and current event of Russell as indexer should go to FTSE Russell.
Matthew hk (
talk) 21:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
KCVelaga (
talk)
05:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | Material from Frank Russell Company was split to Russell Investments on 2020-03-08. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Image:Russelllogo.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
This entry reads like a corporate sales brochure and is therefore likely written by the company that is the subject of the article. If this is true, the objectiveness of the information comes into question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.154.6 ( talk) 09:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Now that Russell has been split into LSEG Russell (Russell Indexes) and the investment division retains the name Russell Investments under new owner TA Associates, both this page and the Russell Indexes page need updating. That's best done by a third-party who is not affiliated with Russell.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.132.94.7 ( talk) 23:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
The current Russell Investments page has a number of factual inaccuracies and unverified claims. The page has been identified as requiring cleanup and additional citations. I am requesting help from an approved editor to review the page and adjust inaccuracies. Specifically - the following:
Done I re-wrote it substantially so that it was more concise and had a different tone. We don't need to list every service individually. If I introduced an error, please let me know.
CorporateM (
Talk)
22:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The list of global offices is missing several locations, namely:
Amsterdam, Beijing, Chicago, San Diego, Milwaukee, Edinburgh [8]
Kosterberg ( talk) 22:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
COI request for edits to company ownership information
Northwestern Mutual is no longer the parent company of Russell Investments. The London Stock Exchange Group completed its acquisition of Russell on December 3, 2014.
Press release issued by LSEG is available here: [1]
Kosterberg ( talk) 18:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
COI request for edits to the company ownership information
The London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) is no longer the parent company of Russell Investments.
LSEG sold Russell Investments to private equity firms TA Associates and Reverence Capital Partners. The acquisition was completed on Jun 1, 2016
The press release issued by TA Associates is available here: [2]
Kosterberg ( talk) 15:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)kosterberg
This wiki article was written in a terrible form. The former Russell group, was headed by Frank Russell Company instead of Russell Investments. London Stock Exchange Group acquired Frank Russell Company instead of Russell Investments in 2014. And then LSEG sold the second-tier subsidiary Russell Investments instead of Frank Russell Company. Based on the timeline and content, most of the content was about Frank Russell Company. However, it seem more appropriate to split the article into Frank Russell Company and Russell Investments. The former covered the combined business and the latter covered the current Russell group. The index provider business of Russell , the current content should be placed in FTSE Russell, however. Matthew hk ( talk) 21:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello! On behalf of Russell Investments via Edelman, and as part of my work with Beutler Ink, I've been working to draft a standalone Wikipedia article specific to Russell Investments. I agree with User:Matthew hk's assessment entirely – the current Frank Russell Company article is a mess, and there should be separate pages for Frank Russell Company and Russell Investments. I've saved a draft article for review here: User:Inkian Jason/Russell Investments.
Given my conflict of interest, I will not publish the article to the main space and ask independent reviewers to check the draft for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. I've used only Wikipedia-appropriate sourcing, and Russell Investments has provided feedback during this process to ensure the article's accuracy. I don't think any of the content is particularly controversial, but I'd be more than happy to address any questions or concerns that may arise during the review process.
As for the Frank Russell Company page, I think the Russell Investments infobox should be removed, and the content should be trimmed down to a stub. The current content is highly problematic (unsourced or poorly sourced, poorly written, etc.); cutting down the text would also allow removal of the other tags. I'm certainly open to others' ideas for addressing the Frank Russell Company article, but cleaning the slate would at least address the tags and set the page up for expansion.
@ Matthew hk: Given your familiarity with these companies, and since you proposed the split back in March 2019, I'm hoping you might be willing to review the draft and copy the markup over to Russell Investments (which is currently a redirect page). I think you'll find this is a solid first step at splitting, and I'd be happy to add a similar COI template to Talk:Russell Investments if a separate page is created. Again, my primary goals here are to create a standalone page for Russell Investments, as you've proposed, and to trim down this page to an appropriate stub in an effort to avoid confusion and encourage future expansion.
Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason ( talk) 17:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Inkian Jason left a note on my Talk page about this open request. I've looked at his proposed draft and consider it to be superior to the current article. As this has been open for more than a week now without objections, I'm going to implement it at EOW assuming no final objections are raised here. Chetsford ( talk) 23:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Russell Investments →
Frank Russell Company – As the step 1 of the proposed split (see above thread). This article was mostly about "Frank Russell Company", the central company of the former Russell group, not the subsidiary Russell Investments. Thus the article title should reflect this first to retain the purpose of this wiki article as an article for a company/group before 2015 split. LSEG only sold Russell Investments the second-tier subsidiary, not the subsidiary Frank Russell Company and all its subsidiaries. (see
press release: "Frank Russell Company's asset management business ('Russell Investments')") The index provider "Russell" was "merged" or now sharing a trading name
FTSE Russell with
FTSE Group, thus future and current event of Russell as indexer should go to FTSE Russell.
Matthew hk (
talk) 21:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
KCVelaga (
talk)
05:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)