![]() | Frank Fetter has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was Fetter really an Austrian? The text of the article says that he didn't self-identify as one. I suggest that we remove "of the Austrian school". Bucketsofg 18:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I have failed the article according to the GA criteria. The article is well-written and has sufficient sources but is missing a few things. First, see if you can add an infobox (look to other economists for examples or WP:Bio). The main reason that I have failed this article is that it is not broad enough. According the criteria, it is not necessary for it to be as comprehensive as the requirements for FA, but at this point, the article appears to be a start or B class at most. I'd recommend elaborating on the other sections, or the success/importance of the books he wrote. Did he develop any significant or notable theories that should be mentioned? There is also no mention of his death. Again, look to other articles for examples of what else to include. Keep expanding the article and then look over the GA criteria before nominating again. Consider getting a peer review to get more assistance in improving the article. -- Nehrams2020 20:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Nice article! As part of the GA review, my suggestions are:
The quote in the "Land as capital" section taken from Land as a factor of production - Chapter 2 references The Principles of Economics 189-190. However, I tracked down a copy of the original text, and I cannot find the quote anywhere. Can anyone else verify this? -- Explodicle ( talk) 18:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti ( talk) 15:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Frank Fetter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Frank Fetter has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was Fetter really an Austrian? The text of the article says that he didn't self-identify as one. I suggest that we remove "of the Austrian school". Bucketsofg 18:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I have failed the article according to the GA criteria. The article is well-written and has sufficient sources but is missing a few things. First, see if you can add an infobox (look to other economists for examples or WP:Bio). The main reason that I have failed this article is that it is not broad enough. According the criteria, it is not necessary for it to be as comprehensive as the requirements for FA, but at this point, the article appears to be a start or B class at most. I'd recommend elaborating on the other sections, or the success/importance of the books he wrote. Did he develop any significant or notable theories that should be mentioned? There is also no mention of his death. Again, look to other articles for examples of what else to include. Keep expanding the article and then look over the GA criteria before nominating again. Consider getting a peer review to get more assistance in improving the article. -- Nehrams2020 20:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Nice article! As part of the GA review, my suggestions are:
The quote in the "Land as capital" section taken from Land as a factor of production - Chapter 2 references The Principles of Economics 189-190. However, I tracked down a copy of the original text, and I cannot find the quote anywhere. Can anyone else verify this? -- Explodicle ( talk) 18:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti ( talk) 15:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Frank Fetter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)