This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this should really be split into two pages, one on Jacinta and one on Francisco. As it stands it's cumbersome. ANB ( talk) 22:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This article needs references that appear in reliable third-party publications. Primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please add more appropriate citations from reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.175.65.8 ( talk) 22:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
The article's current title is "Jacinta and Francisco Marto". It would seem to me that the correct title should be "Francisco and Jacinta Marto", with the children's names reversed. My proposal lists the children not only by alphabetical order, but also by chronological order. The current title seems to be in an arbitrary order and, thus, implies more weight or importance for some reason to Jacinta over Francisco. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks. ( Joseph A. Spadaro ( talk) 22:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC))
I guess the person who wrote this book thought otherwise, for Jacinta comes first. But this oneikes it the other way. History2007 ( talk) 16:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
This article gives us the impression that everything that supposedly occurred in Fátima is historically accurate. It was written from a believer's point of view and only includes sources written by other believers. How do we know that Jacinta said what she said? The whole thing smacks of religious propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.80.12.137 ( talk) 12:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jacinta and Francisco Marto. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Gravestone and other sources give June 11, 1908 https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/find-a-grave-prod/photos/2017/122/8115823_1493861986.jpg Thisdaytrivia ( talk) 18:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The article says, "In 1937 Pope Pius XI decided that causes for minors should not be accepted as they could not fully understand heroic virtue or practice it repeatedly, both of which are essential for canonization. For the next four decades, no sainthood processes for children were pursued." This comes from this article in the National Catholic Register, but it appears to be untrue since Dominic Savio was canonized in 1954. — Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 09:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this should really be split into two pages, one on Jacinta and one on Francisco. As it stands it's cumbersome. ANB ( talk) 22:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This article needs references that appear in reliable third-party publications. Primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please add more appropriate citations from reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.175.65.8 ( talk) 22:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
The article's current title is "Jacinta and Francisco Marto". It would seem to me that the correct title should be "Francisco and Jacinta Marto", with the children's names reversed. My proposal lists the children not only by alphabetical order, but also by chronological order. The current title seems to be in an arbitrary order and, thus, implies more weight or importance for some reason to Jacinta over Francisco. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks. ( Joseph A. Spadaro ( talk) 22:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC))
I guess the person who wrote this book thought otherwise, for Jacinta comes first. But this oneikes it the other way. History2007 ( talk) 16:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
This article gives us the impression that everything that supposedly occurred in Fátima is historically accurate. It was written from a believer's point of view and only includes sources written by other believers. How do we know that Jacinta said what she said? The whole thing smacks of religious propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.80.12.137 ( talk) 12:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jacinta and Francisco Marto. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Gravestone and other sources give June 11, 1908 https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/find-a-grave-prod/photos/2017/122/8115823_1493861986.jpg Thisdaytrivia ( talk) 18:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The article says, "In 1937 Pope Pius XI decided that causes for minors should not be accepted as they could not fully understand heroic virtue or practice it repeatedly, both of which are essential for canonization. For the next four decades, no sainthood processes for children were pursued." This comes from this article in the National Catholic Register, but it appears to be untrue since Dominic Savio was canonized in 1954. — Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 09:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)