Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I added links for the ATP Tour, the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo, The Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, and Tennis.com. I could add more if needed.
Sportsfan77777 (
talk)
04:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
" He is the youngest American ranked in the Top 50" - this is an odd first line, as it's only true now. Usually if someone is the youngest, is when they have been the youngest to win a specific title, not just be the youngest player to be in the top 50. Is this of all time, or currently? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Typically, tennis biographies have a statement about the player's current ranking in the first paragraph of the lead. I don't like to use the exact current ranking because that changes every week and looks silly when it is not updated. This statement probably won't change any time soon because the next highest-ranked player younger than him is JJ Wolf at No. 268. If Tiafoe falls out of the Top 50, I would just change it to Top 100. Both of those are common demarcations.
Sportsfan77777 (
talk)
00:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
youngest American titlist on the ATP Tour since Andy Roddick in 2002. - Is titlist the right word here? Is "event champion" not a better phrase? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
With these two big titles, Tiafoe was the top seed at the 2014 French Open junior tournament. However, he was upset in the second round - Combine into one sentence Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
" "prominence after pushing" not exactly NPOV, but the same sort of issue. "Taking" Federer to five sets is slightly less embellished wording. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Along the way, he defeated his idol and world No. 10 Juan Martín del Potro as well as fellow Next Gen players Hyeon Chung and Denis Shapovalov. - needs a distictive cite to say this was his idol. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
This section could do with a bit of a reorganise. Information on the players family should be first, then about del Potro, then about his sports teams. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi
Sportsfan77777, nice to see you again. I'll be completing this review over the next few days. Word of warning, I know little about tennis itself, and I'm not a big BLP guy, so if I ask any basic questions, please let me know. Good luck! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Placed on hold. Not too much to do, just the above. A few issues with
neutral point of view, but otherwise seems like a great article. I've also done an archive of your sources, to stop
WP:LINKROT. I'll keep this open for you to respond to for around a week. Thanks for reading. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-automated. You have to set the bot to run (although, it does run automatically across Wikipedia, I believe).
https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/index.php?page=runbotsingle is the location. You just have to type in the article name, then click " Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)". Alternatively, you can locate to History (on the article that you want to archive) and under external tools: "fix dead links". That will take you to the location of the url above, and even put in the article name for you. Whilst it's hardly something to stop a potential GA nom, it's something I believe all GAs should have done, as it does help to archive. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)07:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - Y Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
I added links for the ATP Tour, the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo, The Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, and Tennis.com. I could add more if needed.
Sportsfan77777 (
talk)
04:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
" He is the youngest American ranked in the Top 50" - this is an odd first line, as it's only true now. Usually if someone is the youngest, is when they have been the youngest to win a specific title, not just be the youngest player to be in the top 50. Is this of all time, or currently? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Typically, tennis biographies have a statement about the player's current ranking in the first paragraph of the lead. I don't like to use the exact current ranking because that changes every week and looks silly when it is not updated. This statement probably won't change any time soon because the next highest-ranked player younger than him is JJ Wolf at No. 268. If Tiafoe falls out of the Top 50, I would just change it to Top 100. Both of those are common demarcations.
Sportsfan77777 (
talk)
00:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
youngest American titlist on the ATP Tour since Andy Roddick in 2002. - Is titlist the right word here? Is "event champion" not a better phrase? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
With these two big titles, Tiafoe was the top seed at the 2014 French Open junior tournament. However, he was upset in the second round - Combine into one sentence Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
" "prominence after pushing" not exactly NPOV, but the same sort of issue. "Taking" Federer to five sets is slightly less embellished wording. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Along the way, he defeated his idol and world No. 10 Juan Martín del Potro as well as fellow Next Gen players Hyeon Chung and Denis Shapovalov. - needs a distictive cite to say this was his idol. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
This section could do with a bit of a reorganise. Information on the players family should be first, then about del Potro, then about his sports teams. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi
Sportsfan77777, nice to see you again. I'll be completing this review over the next few days. Word of warning, I know little about tennis itself, and I'm not a big BLP guy, so if I ask any basic questions, please let me know. Good luck! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Placed on hold. Not too much to do, just the above. A few issues with
neutral point of view, but otherwise seems like a great article. I've also done an archive of your sources, to stop
WP:LINKROT. I'll keep this open for you to respond to for around a week. Thanks for reading. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)09:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Semi-automated. You have to set the bot to run (although, it does run automatically across Wikipedia, I believe).
https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/index.php?page=runbotsingle is the location. You just have to type in the article name, then click " Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)". Alternatively, you can locate to History (on the article that you want to archive) and under external tools: "fix dead links". That will take you to the location of the url above, and even put in the article name for you. Whilst it's hardly something to stop a potential GA nom, it's something I believe all GAs should have done, as it does help to archive. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)07:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply