This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Arab world Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Under the section title "Fragments" a passage is quoted: "In January the people of Hims took...On the twenty-sixth of May the Saqilara went..." What's special about this passage. Is this the only surviving passage? Does Robert Hoyland quote no other passage in his book? A rationale must be provided as to why this passage, and this passage only must be quoted in the article. Bless sins ( talk) 22:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC) reply

This article is about a fragment, of which the quoted text is the readable portion. Hoyland quotes many other sources but this article is about that particular source, which he titled "Fragment on the Arab Conquests". Str1977 ^(talk) 09:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Can someone please clear for me why this contradicts the traditional date of the death of Muhammed? The sources never mentions Muhammed being alive. -- BelalSaid ( talk) 07:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC) reply

That's Cook/Crone's interpretation of Muhammad being mentioned. Str1977 ^(talk) 09:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC) reply

It would be great to see some details such as the manuscript(s) in which this passage is preserved, the original language, link to editions, etc. Grover cleveland ( talk) 15:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply