This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Canadian / North America / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military land vehicles task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Canadian military history task force North American military history task force World War II task force

I reverted the name, because "Fox Armoured Car" is the vehicles name otherwise it could have been Fox (armoured car) etc GraemeLeggett 08:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I forget to add to also compare with AEC Armoured Car etc. GraemeLeggett

But are the words "Armoured Car" part of the formal name or official designation? I see your point, but I think " Fox armoured car" is perfectly acceptable as a name, with only the title "Fox" being a proper noun. — Michael  Z. 2005-06-21 19:02 Z

So far as I can tell, yes. Though it might have been Car, Armoured, Reconnaisannce, Fox knowing the British Commonwealth way of naming things. Give me a little while longer to confirm. GraemeLeggett 19:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The bottom two links are dead — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:215F:2B00:1D32:FA05:5E1:558 ( talk) 13:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC) reply