![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fourteenth Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The event described in this article does not appear to be notable. Per Wikipedia policy, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline
This means that there need to be reliable secondary sources addressing the event. But this article relies entirely on primary sources - news article and columns. These are primary sources according to Wikipedia policy. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_sources#Are_news-reporting_media_secondary_or_primary_sources? Moreover, nearly all the sources are articles from Catholic media outlets. The lack of "significant coverage" from a mainstream news outlet suggests that this event was not notable. The only secondary source regarding the synods is Ed Pentin's book, which is available only in Kindle edition.
I recommend this article for deletion. Thoughts? PluniaZ ( talk) 23:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
There are more sources on google scholar: https://scholar.google.de/scholar?start=0&q=%22Fourteenth+Ordinary+General+Assembly+of+the+Synod+of+Bishops%22&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5 And you can also find references in news outlets that are not Catholic: https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=657&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&ei=JR9fXJCBN8rEwALjt7aADw&q=synod+2015&oq=synod+2015&gs_l=psy-ab.3...101825.105390.0.105886.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.0OFS_ImdW7U
Probably, the Catholic ones were used, as they are probably more specific. -- QuasiPerlach ( talk) 18:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fourteenth Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The event described in this article does not appear to be notable. Per Wikipedia policy, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline
This means that there need to be reliable secondary sources addressing the event. But this article relies entirely on primary sources - news article and columns. These are primary sources according to Wikipedia policy. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_sources#Are_news-reporting_media_secondary_or_primary_sources? Moreover, nearly all the sources are articles from Catholic media outlets. The lack of "significant coverage" from a mainstream news outlet suggests that this event was not notable. The only secondary source regarding the synods is Ed Pentin's book, which is available only in Kindle edition.
I recommend this article for deletion. Thoughts? PluniaZ ( talk) 23:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
There are more sources on google scholar: https://scholar.google.de/scholar?start=0&q=%22Fourteenth+Ordinary+General+Assembly+of+the+Synod+of+Bishops%22&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5 And you can also find references in news outlets that are not Catholic: https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=657&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&ei=JR9fXJCBN8rEwALjt7aADw&q=synod+2015&oq=synod+2015&gs_l=psy-ab.3...101825.105390.0.105886.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.0OFS_ImdW7U
Probably, the Catholic ones were used, as they are probably more specific. -- QuasiPerlach ( talk) 18:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)